India, BRICS and the Development Agenda: Education Spending & the Electric Mobility Push

Advertisement

 Context

The BRICS Joint Statistical Publication 2026 and the 13th BRICS Education Ministers' Meeting (Bhubaneswar, August 7, 2026) have renewed focus on two development themes ahead of the BRICS ministerial-level meeting in New Delhi (September 12–13, 2026): public investment in education, and the shift toward equitable electric mobility. Both issues intersect with India's twin challenges of human capital formation and low-carbon growth.

 Education Spending: Key Data Points

Indicator

Value

India's public spending on education (2016)

1.2% of GDP

India's public spending on education (2023)

4.1% of GDP

Brazil

4.9% of GDP

South Africa

10.5% of GDP

China

4.02% of GDP

Russia

3.5% of GDP

UAE

3.8% of GDP

Indonesia

0.3% of GDP

India — urban household education spend (2000 → 2025)

4.3% → 6%

India — rural household education spend (2000 → 2025)

1.9% → 3.2%

 

 

Points to note: India's public education expenditure has more than tripled as a share of GDP since 2016, yet still trails Brazil and South Africa. China's higher GDP base and older population (median age 41 vs India's 29) mean comparisons of ratios alone can understate India's real resource gap, since India must educate a much larger youth cohort with a smaller GDP base — a point examiners often test as an analytical nuance rather than a raw number.

 

Employment structure mismatch

  • 43% of India's employed population remains in the primary sector (agriculture and allied), against 29.3% (Indonesia), 22.2% (China), 8% (South Africa), and 5.3% (Russia).
  • India's primary-sector employment share has fallen only 1.6 percentage points since 2018 (44.6%→43%), indicating slow structural transformation.
  • Industry: 25.1%; Services: 31.9% of employment.

The core policy problem

Rising education spending has not translated into a matching shift toward higher-productivity, non-farm employment — the classic "jobless/low-productivity growth" concern. The BRICS Education Ministers' Declaration flagged the need for:

  • Greater alignment of training programmes with evolving market demand.
  • Stronger linkage between Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) institutions and industry.

 BRICS and the Electric Vehicle (EV) Transition

An assessment by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), covering 11 full BRICS members and 10 partner countries, finds that at least seven BRICS nations — including India, China, and Brazil — are redirecting EV support away from private cars toward shared and low-income transport modes: buses and two-wheelers.

Rationale

  • Advances affordable mobility and equity.
  • Reduces oil consumption and import dependence — critical for oil-importing economies.
  • Cuts pollution, and shields low-income households from fuel price shocks.
  • Counters the common critique that EV subsidies mostly benefit affluent, private car-owning households.

Country-wise measures

Country

Measure

India

FAME (Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid & Electric Vehicles), launched 2015; successive phases since

Indonesia

~$460 subsidy per e-motorcycle (2023); withdrawn in 2025 (sales fell 29%); revived at ~$173 (August 2026)

Thailand

"EV 3.5" package — subsidies for e-motorcycles priced below ~$4,500

China

National trade-in programme; supported 125 million e-bicycle purchases in 2025 alone

Expert view (Sunil Mani, IISD): For oil-importing economies, the EV transition is not just about emissions but about reducing exposure to global oil markets and protecting low-income households from price volatility; car-centric subsidies risk regressive outcomes (subsidising wealthier private car owners).

 Way Forward / Analytical Takeaways

  1. Convert spending into outcomes: Raising the education budget alone is insufficient; India needs demand-linked vocational curricula and stronger industry-academia partnerships (a recurring Mains theme).
  2. Structural transformation lag: Reducing dependence on low-productivity agriculture requires parallel investment in manufacturing and services skilling, not education spending in isolation.
  3. Equity-centred green transition: India's EV policy design (two-wheelers, buses, shared mobility) offers a model of just transition — balancing decarbonisation with affordability, a theme useful for both GS-III (environment) and essay-type answers on inclusive growth.
  4. India as a BRICS convener: With India hosting the September 2026 BRICS meeting, expect further declarations on TVET cooperation and green mobility financing — worth tracking for current affairs continuity.

Advertisement