US, EU Criticise India’s Trade Barriers at WTO
Context
- The US and European Union (EU), India’s two largest trading partners, have raised concerns over India’s growing use of tariff and non-tariff barriers during its eighth Trade Policy Review (TPR) at the World Trade Organization (WTO).
- They argued that high tariffs and regulatory restrictions could undermine India’s efforts to integrate with global supply chains and benefit from greater economic openness.
- The concerns cover goods, services, digital trade, investment and government procurement, highlighting the tension between domestic industrial policy and deeper global economic integration.
Major Trade Barriers Highlighted
|
Area |
Concerns raised |
|
Tariffs |
High import duties increase the cost of accessing the Indian market. |
|
SPS measures |
Measures relating to human, animal and plant health were described as potentially unjustified or excessive. |
|
TBTs |
Technical regulations and standards may create additional barriers for foreign exporters. |
|
Quality Control Orders |
Growing QCOs and conformity-assessment requirements can raise compliance costs, particularly where Indian standards differ from international standards. |
|
Services & digital trade |
Restrictions may limit market access for foreign service providers and digital businesses. |
|
Local-content requirements |
US raised concerns that mandatory domestic-content rules may discriminate against foreign producers and investors. |
|
Government procurement |
EU flagged narrowing access for foreign firms. |
|
Customs |
EU highlighted unpredictable and cumbersome customs procedures. |
|
IPR & GIs |
Gaps in protection of intellectual property rights and geographical indications were also flagged by the EU. |
Specific Concerns of the US and EU
- The US called for significant tariff reduction, removal of unjustified SPS and TBT measures, and fewer barriers to services and digital trade.
- It also urged India to roll back regulations that discriminate against foreign exporters and investors and to strengthen transparency and regulatory predictability.
- The EU particularly criticised unpredictable customs procedures and burdensome conformity-assessment requirements arising from QCOs.
- According to the EU, excessive divergence from internationally accepted standards could insulate the Indian market from global competition and reverse gains made through economic integration.
- The EU acknowledged that India has initiated reforms following the NITI Aayog High-Level Committee’s review of QCOs and indicated that effective implementation of its recommendations could address several concerns.
WTO Trade Policy Review Mechanism
- The TPR is a peer-review mechanism designed to improve transparency and understanding of members’ trade policies.
- India undergoes a TPR once every five years.
- The WTO Secretariat and the country under review prepare separate detailed reports covering trade policies, regulations and priorities.
- Other WTO members submit written questions on tariffs, regulations and specific trade barriers, which are subsequently discussed during the review meeting.
- The mechanism does not directly impose trade-policy changes; rather, it promotes transparency, predictability and accountability in the international trading system.
Implications and Way Forward
- India needs to distinguish between legitimate regulatory measures for consumer safety, public health and strategic interests and protectionist measures that unnecessarily restrict trade.
- SPS, TBT and QCO requirements should be science-based, transparent and, wherever feasible, harmonised with internationally recognised standards.
- Customs procedures and conformity-assessment processes should be simplified to reduce transaction costs and improve India’s attractiveness within global value chains.
- Local-content requirements and restrictions on digital and services trade need periodic review to ensure that industrial-policy objectives do not undermine competitiveness and investment.
- Greater protection of IPRs and GIs and predictable access to government procurement can strengthen India’s credibility as a reliable trading partner.
- The challenge for India is to balance strategic autonomy and domestic manufacturing with the need for openness, competitiveness and integration into global supply chains.

