Other Backward Class — 2017 Paper II
Other Backward Class.
Model Answer
VAID ICSApproach
- Demand of Question:Explain OBC as a constitutional-administrative category of social and educational backwardness, distinguish it from SC/ST and mention major commissions, reservation and present constitutional institutions.
- Structuring the Response:Define -> historical commissions/Mandal -> reservation and creamy layer -> constitutional developments -> anthropological caution about internal heterogeneity.
- Key Dimensions to Cover:Article 340; Kaka Kalelkar and Mandal Commissions; Indra Sawhney (1992); 27% Central reservation; creamy layer; Article 338B/NCBC and 342A after 102nd Amendment; 105th Amendment and State lists.
Model Answer
Introduction The "Other Backward Classes" (OBCs) is a constitutional and administrative category encompassing socially and educationally backward communities, distinct from SCs and STs. Anthropologically, it is an extremely heterogeneous group comprising peasant castes, artisans, pastoralists, and service communities.
Body (Draw a Flowchart: Article 340 ➔ Kaka Kalelkar (1953) ➔ Mandal Commission (1979) ➔ Indra Sawhney Judgment (1992: 27% Quota + Creamy Layer) ➔ 102nd Amendment (NCBC as Constitutional Body))
Constitutional & Policy Evolution: Article 340 provides for the identification of backward classes. The Mandal Commission (1979) recognized 52% of India's population as OBCs, recommending a 27% reservation in central services, which was upheld by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney case (1992) with the introduction of the "Creamy Layer" to exclude the economically advanced. Recent milestones include the 102nd Amendment (granting constitutional status to the NCBC under Art 338B) and the 105th Amendment (restoring States' power to maintain their own SEBC lists).
Anthropological Reality & Internal Heterogeneity: OBCs are not a monolithic bloc. Sociologist M.N. Srinivas introduced the concept of the "Dominant Caste" (e.g., Yadavs in UP, Vokkaligas in Karnataka), demonstrating that intermediate ritual status often coexists with vast numerical strength, landholding, and political power.
Conclusion Because of this stark internal inequality, affirmative action benefits have been disproportionately cornered by dominant OBCs. Consequently, the push for equitable sub-categorization (as evaluated by the Justice Rohini Commission) represents the necessary evolution of OBC policy to ensure substantive justice reaches the most marginalized artisan and service castes.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.