VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
+91 93113 37737
  • +91-93113 37737, +91-99999 46748
  • 73(FF), Old Rajender Nagar Market, Delhi - 110060
  • MON to SUN 9.00 am - 6.00 pm
Facebook Youtube Instagram
Menu
Enquire Now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2018/Paper II/Tribal India
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper II 2018 20 Marks Model Answer Available

Economic Typology of Tribes — 2018 Paper II

Question · 2018 · Paper II · 20 Marks

Compare and contrast the economic typology of tribes given by different anthropologists.

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Approach

  • Demand of Question: Compare major anthropological classifications of tribal economies and show the similarities and differences in their criteria and level of differentiation.
  • Structuring the Response: Present Thurnwald, Majumdar–Madan and L.P. Vidyarthi separately, then compare their typologies and critically assess their contemporary usefulness.
  • Key Dimensions to Cover: Hunting-gathering, shifting cultivation, settled agriculture, pastoralism, artisans, industrial labour, Thurnwald, Majumdar-Madan, Vidyarthi and mixed economies.

Model Answer

Introduction: Economic typology classifies tribal communities primarily according to their dominant mode of subsistence, technology and relationship with natural resources and markets. Different anthropologists developed classifications of varying complexity, reflecting both evolutionary perspectives and the diversity of Indian tribal economies.

  1. Thurnwald’s classification

Richard Thurnwald developed a broad comparative classification of economic organization. Important categories included:

  1. homogeneous communities of male hunters/trappers and female collectors;
  2. hunters, trappers and agriculturists;
  3. graded societies of hunters, cultivators and artisans;
  4. pastoral or herding communities;
  5. hunting-herding combinations;
  6. cattle-breeding and trading populations;
  7. socially differentiated combinations of herding, agriculture and craft production.

Indian examples often used to illustrate these include:

  • Kadar, Chenchu, Kharia — hunting-gathering;
  • Baiga, Kamar — hunting combined with cultivation;
  • Toda — pastoralism;
  • Bhotia — pastoralism and trade.

Thurnwald’s approach therefore emphasized increasing economic differentiation and occupational complexity.

  1. Majumdar and Madan

D.N. Majumdar and T.N. Madan proposed a more compact classification specifically useful for Indian tribes. They recognized six broad economic categories:

  1. food gatherers and hunters;
  2. agricultural tribes;
  3. shifting cultivators;
  4. handicraft-producing tribes;
  5. pastoralists;
  6. industrial labourers.

Examples may include:

  • Birhor/Chenchu — food gathering;
  • Baiga — shifting cultivation;
  • Toda — pastoralism;
  • Agaria — traditional craft specialization;
  • Santhal and Oraon populations in mining-industrial regions — industrial labour.

Their scheme reflects both traditional subsistence and the increasing incorporation of tribes into the modern industrial economy.

  1. L.P. Vidyarthi’s classification

L.P. Vidyarthi developed a more differentiated economic-cultural typology of Indian tribes, including:

  1. forest-hunting type;
  2. shifting hill-cultivator type;
  3. settled/plains agricultural type;
  4. simple artisan type;
  5. pastoral type;
  6. folk-artist type;
  7. manual-labour type;
  8. white-collar employment and trader type.

Vidyarthi’s scheme therefore extends beyond subsistence to include communities integrated into:

  • wage labour;
  • trade;
  • modern occupations.

Thus:

Forest economy → Agriculture/Pastoralism → Labour/Market economy → Modern employment

Comparative assessment

Anthropologist Main emphasis Distinctive feature
Thurnwald General economic evolution and differentiation Comparative, cross-cultural typology
Majumdar & Madan Dominant occupation of Indian tribes Simple six-fold Indian classification
L.P. Vidyarthi Economic-cultural adaptation Greater differentiation, including modern occupations

Common elements

All three recognize, in different forms:

  • hunting-gathering;
  • agriculture;
  • pastoralism;
  • craft specialization.

Their major difference lies in the degree of subdivision and attention to market incorporation.

Critical assessment

These classifications are analytically useful but have limitations.

  1. Tribal economies are rarely pure types: A Baiga household may combine cultivation, forest collection and wage labour.
  2. Primary occupation may change seasonally.
  3. Market penetration has produced mixed economies:

Subsistence + Wage labour + Forest produce + Government employment

  1. Typologies may imply an evolutionary ladder: Hunting-gathering should not automatically be regarded as an inferior “stage” preceding agriculture.
  2. Development and migration blur traditional categories.

Hence contemporary anthropology increasingly emphasizes livelihood systems, ecological adaptation and articulation with markets, rather than fixed economic types.

Conclusion

Thurnwald provided a broad comparative framework, Majumdar and Madan offered a concise classification of Indian tribal livelihoods, while Vidyarthi captured greater occupational diversity and market integration. These typologies remain useful heuristically, but contemporary tribal economies are better understood as dynamic, diversified and increasingly mixed livelihood systems

2026 Dravidian language family and its tribal speakers. 2026 Buddhist tribes of India. 2026 Nature-Man-Spirit-Complex. 2026 Make a critical appraisal of Surajit Sinha's line of argument that tribes and castes may not be isolated social categories, but are a part of the great Indian civilization.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

Join Workshop Contact VAID ICS

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2018 — Paper II

28 questions

5(c) Agrarian social structure

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 5.1 Indian Village > Agrarian relations in Indian villages
2018Paper IIVillage India, Urbanisation & Social ChangeModel answer available

1(c) Endangered Languages

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 2. Demographic profile of India > Linguistic elements and their distribution
2018Paper IIIndian Society, Caste & CivilizationModel answer available

5(e) Modernization

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 5.3 Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change > Modernization
2018Paper IIVillage India, Urbanisation & Social ChangeModel answer available

1(d) OBCs among non-Hindu communities

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 7.1 Problems of exploitation and deprivation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes
2018Paper IIIndian Society, Caste & CivilizationModel answer available

1(b) Philosophy behind Purusharthas

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 3.1 Structure and nature of traditional Indian social system > Purushartha
2018Paper IIIndian Society, Caste & CivilizationModel answer available

5(b) Tribe and scheduled tribe

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 6.1 Tribal situation in India > Definition and scheduling of tribes
2018Paper IITribal IndiaModel answer available

5(a) Youth dormitory as an institution

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 6.1 Tribal situation in India > Social institutions of tribal societies
2018Paper IITribal IndiaModel answer available