VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2019/Paper II/Village India, Urbanisation & Social Change
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper II 2019 20 Marks Model Answer Available

Theoretical Concepts from Indian Village Studies — 2019 Paper II

Question · 2019 · Paper II · 20 Marks

Identify the theoretical concepts that have emerged out of village studies in India.

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Approach

  • Demand of Question: Identify and explain the major anthropological and sociological concepts developed through intensive studies of Indian villages.
  • Structuring the Response: Organize scholar-wise concepts and show how village studies transformed understanding of caste, mobility, power and civilization.
  • Key Dimensions to Cover: Srinivas, dominant caste, Sanskritization, Westernization, Marriott, universalization-parochialization, Little-Great Tradition, Jajmani and factionalism.

Model Answer

Introduction: Intensive village studies became a major feature of Indian anthropology after Independence. Rather than viewing villages as isolated and static communities, scholars demonstrated their connections with caste, economy, politics and wider Indian civilization, generating several influential theoretical concepts.

  1. Sanskritization — M.N. Srinivas

From his studies of caste and social change, M.N. Srinivas developed the concept of Sanskritization: the process through which a lower caste or tribal group seeks upward mobility by adopting practices associated with higher castes.

These may include:

  • vegetarianism;
  • teetotalism;
  • Sanskritic rituals;
  • claims to higher ritual status.

Thus:

Adoption of higher-caste practices → Claim to higher status → Positional mobility

It demonstrated that caste hierarchy was not completely static.

  1. Dominant Caste — M.N. Srinivas

From village studies, especially his work on Rampura, Srinivas developed the concept of dominant caste.

Dominance depends upon a combination of:

  • numerical strength;
  • landownership;
  • economic resources;
  • political influence;
  • relatively high ritual status.

The concept shifted analysis from ritual hierarchy alone to actual power relations within villages.

  1. Westernization — M.N. Srinivas

Srinivas used Westernization to describe changes resulting from prolonged contact with British rule and modern institutions such as:

  • education;
  • technology;
  • bureaucracy;
  • law;
  • communication.

It helped distinguish indigenous status mobility from broader processes of modernization.

  1. Little and Great Traditions

Robert Redfield and Milton Singer used the concepts of:

  • Little Tradition — localized beliefs and practices of village communities;
  • Great Tradition — literate, textual and pan-civilizational traditions.

Indian village studies showed continuous interaction between them:

Local tradition ↔ Civilizational tradition

This challenged the idea of the village as a completely autonomous cultural unit.

  1. Universalization and Parochialization — McKim Marriott

From his study of Kishan Garhi, McKim Marriott explained cultural interaction through two processes:

  • Universalization: Local cultural elements move upward and become part of a wider Great Tradition.
  • Parochialization: Elements of the Great Tradition are localized and transformed within village culture.

Thus:

Little Tradition Great Tradition

  1. Jajmani System

William H. Wiser’s study of village society highlighted the Jajmani system—hereditary relationships of service and exchange between cultivating patrons and occupational castes.

It revealed that village economy was embedded within:

  • caste;
  • reciprocity;
  • hereditary occupation;
  • unequal social relations.
  1. Village factionalism and power

Village studies also revealed that villages were not harmonious, self-contained “republics”. Scholars identified:

  • factions;
  • caste competition;
  • kinship blocs;
  • leadership struggles;
  • economic inequalities.

Studies by scholars such as F.G. Bailey demonstrated how caste, economic resources and political power interact at the local level.

  1. Village as part of a wider system

A major theoretical contribution of village studies was rejection of the isolated village model.

The village was shown to be linked with:

Village → Region → Market → State → Civilization

Migration, pilgrimage, marriage networks, administration and markets connected rural communities to wider structures.

Significance of village studies

These concepts transformed Indian anthropology by shifting emphasis from:

Static caste hierarchy → Social mobility and power

and from:

Isolated village → Interconnected social system

Conclusion

Indian village studies generated concepts such as Sanskritization, dominant caste, Westernization, universalization-parochialization and Jajmani relations, while also exposing factionalism and wider regional linkages. Their major contribution was to establish the Indian village as a dynamic arena of hierarchy, mobility, power and cultural interaction.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2019 — Paper II

28 questions
Syllabus: Paper II > 9.3 Contributions of anthropology to the understanding of regionalism, communalism and ethnic and political movements
2019Paper IIEthnicity, Tribal Movements & Social ChangeModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 7.3 The concept of ethnicity > Regionalism and demand for autonomy
2019Paper IIEthnicity, Tribal Movements & Social ChangeModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 6.2 Problems of the tribal communities > Low literacy and poor educational facilities
2019Paper IITribal Problems & DisplacementModel answer available