Little and Great Traditions — 2025 Paper II
Characteristics and communication between Little and Great Traditions
Model Answer
VAID ICSIntroduction
Robert Redfield developed the concepts of Great Tradition and Little Tradition in Peasant Society and Culture (1956) to explain the social organisation of civilisation. A peasant community is neither culturally isolated nor completely absorbed into urban civilisation; it participates in both a local tradition and a wider civilisational tradition.
Milton Singer and McKim Marriott applied this framework to Indian society and examined the continuous communication between these traditions.
Characteristics
| Great Tradition | Little Tradition |
| Culture of the literate and reflective few | Culture of peasants, artisans and local communities |
| Textual, codified and consciously cultivated | Mainly oral, customary and experience-based |
| Carried by priests, scholars and cultural specialists | Carried by elders, folk priests, healers, bards and performers |
| Associated with temples, schools, cities and sacred centres | Associated with villages, local shrines and everyday life |
| Wider civilisational reach | Local and regionally variable |
| Includes scriptures, philosophy and classical arts | Includes folk tales, local myths, songs, rituals and deities |
The distinction is analytical rather than absolute. Both traditions form interdependent parts of one civilisation.
Communication between the Traditions
McKim Marriott, through his study of Kishan Garhi, explained their interaction through two complementary processes.
Universalisation
An element of the Little Tradition is carried upward, systematised and incorporated into the Great Tradition.
For example, a local goddess may be identified with Durga or Kali and acquire wider textual and pilgrimage significance.
Parochialisation
An element of the Great Tradition moves downward and is modified according to local ecology, language and social conditions.
For example, the Ramayana is recreated through regional versions, village Ramlila, folk songs and local interpretations.
Thus, communication does not involve simple copying; cultural elements are selected, reinterpreted and transformed.
Channels of Communication
Milton Singer highlighted cultural performances as major bridges between the two levels. Communication occurs through:
- pilgrimage centres, temples and festivals;
- priests, monks, teachers, bards and storytellers;
- fairs, marriage networks and migration;
- folk theatre, songs and oral epics;
- print, cinema, television and digital media.
Singer’s concepts of cultural specialists, cultural media and cultural performances influenced L.P. Vidyarthi’s study of the sacred complex, consisting of sacred geography, sacred specialists and sacred performances.
Relation with Sanskritisation
Universalisation should not be confused with Sanskritisation. Sanskritisation, given by M.N. Srinivas, primarily explains status mobility through the adoption of higher-caste practices. Marriott’s concepts explain the wider circulation of cultural elements between local and civilisational traditions.
Critical Evaluation
The framework explains cultural unity amid diversity, but it may:
- imply an unjustified hierarchy between elite and folk cultures;
- treat villagers as passive recipients;
- overlook caste, class, gender and political power;
- underestimate the existence of several competing Great Traditions;
- become less distinct under urbanisation and mass communication.
Conclusion
Great and Little Traditions are not separate cultural compartments. Their continuous interaction through universalisation, parochialisation and cultural performance enables Indian civilisation to maintain continuity while accommodating regional diversity and cultural innovation.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.