Tana Bhagat Movement — 2026 Paper II
Tana Bhagat movement.
Model Answer
VAID ICS| Approach
• Demand of Question: Explain the Tana Bhagat movement as a tribal socio-religious and agrarian movement, tracing its transformation from Oraon reform to anti-colonial mobilization. • Structuring the Response: Locate it in Chotanagpur and identify Jatra Oraon/Jatra Bhagat (1914); explain religious purification, anti-begar/rent protest and later Gandhian linkage; add an anthropological interpretation of revitalization, identity and selective acculturation. • Key Dimensions to Cover: Jatra Oraon; 1914; Oraon; Dharmesh; liquor/sacrifice reform; begar, rent and diku exploitation; Non-Cooperation/Gandhian idiom; K.S. Singh; revitalization and ethnic assertion. |
Model Answer
Introduction: The Tana Bhagat movement began in 1914 under Jatra Oraon (Jatra Bhagat) among the Oraons of Chotanagpur. It is best read as a layered movement in which religious reform generated a moral community that soon challenged agrarian and colonial domination.
Three interlinked dimensions
- Religious-moral reform: Followers emphasized worship of a supreme deity (Dharmesh), purity, abstention from liquor and meat/animal sacrifice, and rejection of practices they considered socially degrading. This was selective internal reform, not simply imitation of “upper-caste” Hinduism.
- Agrarian protest: The movement opposed begar (forced labour), excessive rents, taxes and exploitative intermediaries/dikus. Thus ritual reform became a language through which land, labour and dignity were defended.
- Nationalist convergence: From about 1920, Tana Bhagats adopted khadi, non-violence and Congress programmes, participating in Non-Cooperation and later nationalist mobilization. Local grievances were thereby articulated through a wider anti-colonial idiom.
Anthropological interpretation
- Revitalization: In Anthony F.C. Wallace's sense, cultural stress generated deliberate reorganization of values and institutions.
- Identity and agency: K.S. Singh's historical-anthropological approach helps show that such movements were not irrational “tribal disturbances” but purposive responses to altered land, power and cultural relations.
Conclusion: Tana Bhagat demonstrates the holistic character of tribal movements: religion, economy and politics were not separate spheres. Reform of the self and community became the moral basis for resisting exploitation while retaining a distinct Oraon identity.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.