VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
+91 93113 37737
  • +91-93113 37737, +91-99999 46748
  • 73(FF), Old Rajender Nagar Market, Delhi - 110060
  • MON to SUN 9.00 am - 6.00 pm
Facebook Youtube Instagram
Menu
Enquire Now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2017/Paper I/Anthropological Theories
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper I 2017 20 Marks Model Answer Available

Ruth Benedict’s Patterns of Culture — 2017 Paper I

Question · 2017 · Paper I · 20 Marks

Explain Ruth Benedict's patterns of culture.

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Approach

  • Demand of Question:Explain Benedict's configurational concept of culture, its ethnographic illustrations, theoretical contribution and major criticisms.
  • Structuring the Response:Place Benedict in the Boasian tradition; explain selection from the 'arc' of possibilities and cultural configuration; discuss Zuni, Dobu and Kwakiutl; evaluate strengths and limits.
  • Key Dimensions to Cover:Ruth Benedict; Patterns of Culture (1934); configuration, ethos, cultural relativism; Apollonian Zuni, Dobu, Dionysian Kwakiutl; critique of over-integration.

Model Answer

Introduction In her seminal work Patterns of Culture (1934), Ruth Benedict, a prominent figure in the Culture and Personality school, advanced the "Configurational Approach." Rooted in the Boasian tradition of historical particularism, she argued that a culture is not a random collection of isolated traits, but a highly integrated, consistent pattern of thought and action organized around a core dominant ethos.

Body

  1. The Concept of the "Great Arc" and SelectionDrawing on Gestalt psychology, Benedict posited that the range of possible human behaviors is like a "Great Arc." No single society can incorporate all these possibilities. Each culture unconsciously selectsa limited segment of this arc, institutionalizing certain traits while rejecting others. These selected traits are then integrated into a distinct Cultural Configuration.
  2. Ethnographic IllustrationsTo prove that different cultures mold human personality differently, Benedict contrasted three distinct societies using psychological labels (borrowed from Friedrich Nietzsche):
  • The Zuni of New Mexico (The "Apollonian" Ethos):
    • Traits: Restrained, non-competitive, cooperative, and deeply ceremonial.
    • Configuration: They value moderation and social harmony. Individualism, excessive emotion, or seeking power are actively discouraged.
  • The Kwakiutl of Vancouver Island (The "Dionysian" Ethos):
    • Traits: Competitive, individualistic, emotional, and aggressive.
    • Configuration: Centered around fierce rivalry and prestige, best exemplified by the Potlatch ceremony where chiefs destroy wealth to shame rivals and elevate their own status.
  • The Dobuans of Melanesia (The "Paranoid" Ethos):
    • Traits: Suspicious, secretive, and treacherous.
    • Configuration: Interpersonal relations are marked by a deep fear of sorcery. Trust is non-existent, even among close kin, and ill-will towards neighbors is culturally normalized.
  1. Theoretical Significance
  • Cultural Relativism: She proved that what is considered "abnormal" in one society (e.g., paranoia) might be perfectly normal in another.
  • Holism: Shifted anthropology away from studying isolated traits (like basket weaving) toward understanding the underlying psychological integration of a society.
  1. Criticisms
  • Over-Stereotyping (Typological flaw): Critics argue she reduced complex societies to single, monolithic psychological labels, ignoring internal diversity.
  • Ignored Deviance and Conflict: By emphasizing perfect integration, she overlooked gender, class conflicts, and individuals who do not fit the cultural mold.
  • Methodological Flaws: She relied heavily on secondary data (Boas’s notes for the Kwakiutl) rather than her own direct fieldwork for some groups.

Conclusion Despite its tendency to oversimplify, Benedict’s configurational approach remains a landmark contribution. It decisively demonstrated that culture is a powerful mold that shapes human personality, fundamentally establishing that concepts of "normality" and "abnormality" are culturally relative, not biologically fixed.

 

2026 How is the theory of structuralism helpful in understanding the concepts of caste and gender? 2026 Critically discuss how culture determines human behaviour in the light of Leslie White's theory. 2026 Compare Edmund Leach's structuralism with interpretive anthropology of Clifford Geertz. 2026 Discuss, with appropriate examples, how basic personality types may lead towards building up of national character.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

Join Workshop Contact VAID ICS

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2017 — Paper I

28 questions

5(d) Age at menarche

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > 11.1 Relevance of menarche, menopause and other bio-events to fertility
2017Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available

5(e) Anthropology and designing of equipments

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > 12. Applications of Anthropology > Anthropology in designing of defence and other equipments
2017Paper IApplied & Forensic AnthropologyModel answer available

5(c) Concept of race

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > 9.5 Race and racism > Biological basis of racial classification
2017Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available

5(a) Hardy-Weinberg law

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > 9.3 Mendelian population and Hardy-Weinberg law
2017Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available

1(d) Non-verbal communication

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > 7. Culture, language and communication > Verbal and non-verbal communication
2017Paper ICulture & SocietyModel answer available

1(e) Questionnaire

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > 8.3 Research Methods: Tools of data collection > Questionnaire
2017Paper IResearch Methods in AnthropologyModel answer available