Tribal Sub-Plan: Emergence, Features and Limitations — 2017 Paper II
Discuss the emergence, salient features and limitations of Tribal sub-plan.
Model Answer
VAID ICSApproach
- Demand of Question:Cover three explicit parts - emergence, design/features and limitations - and update terminology to STC/DAPST without confusing the historical TSP with a single scheme.
- Structuring the Response:Fifth Plan origins -> area/population targeting and fund earmarking -> institutional mechanisms -> implementation failures -> contemporary STC/DAPST transition.
- Key Dimensions to Cover:Fifth Five-Year Plan 1974-75; L.P. Vidyarthi/task-force context; ITDP/ITDA, MADA and clusters; proportionate flow of sectoral funds; non-divertibility/additionality ideals; fragmentation, notional expenditure, weak participation/outcomes; DAPST/STC monitoring.
Model Answer
Introduction The Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP) strategy was a watershed policy shift introduced during the Fifth Five-Year Plan (1974-75), heavily influenced by the task force led by anthropologist L.P. Vidyarthi. It emerged from the realization that general community development programs had failed to bridge the development gap, necessitating a dedicated, area-specific strategy for Scheduled Tribes (STs).
Body
Salient Features:
- Proportionate Earmarking: The core philosophy was that all central and state government ministries must earmark plan outlays for ST development at least in proportion to the ST population in the state/country (e.g., 8.6% nationally).
- Area-Population Focus: It adopted a specialized administrative architecture based on population density. Contiguous tribal majority blocks were grouped into Integrated Tribal Development Projects/Agencies (ITDP/ITDA). Smaller pockets were covered under MADA (Modified Area Development Approach) and clusters.
- Sectoral Convergence: It aimed to integrate funds from agriculture, education, health, and rural development, converging them territorially to prevent exploitation and build infrastructure.
Limitations & Failures:
- Notional Accounting: Departments frequently engaged in "book transfers," classifying general infrastructure (like a state highway passing through a tribal district) as TSP expenditure without any direct benefit to tribal households.
- Diversion and Lapses: Earmarked funds were routinely diverted to non-tribal schemes or allowed to lapse at the end of the financial year.
- Lack of Cultural Sensitivity: Uniform sectoral schemes were imposed without considering the unique cultural ecology or dispersed settlement patterns of different tribes.
- Top-Down Approach: The planning bypassed local Gram Sabhas, rendering the strategy bureaucratic rather than participatory.
Conclusion To address these limitations, the TSP has recently evolved into the Scheduled Tribe Component (STC) / Development Action Plan for Scheduled Tribes (DAPST). Tracked by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs via a centralized online portal, it enforces non-divertibility. However, true success requires moving beyond financial earmarking to outcome-based planning that begins with community consent and respects localized habitat rights.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.