Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups of the Islands — 2026 Paper II
Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG) of the islands.
Model Answer
VAID ICS| Approach
• Demand of Question: Identify the PVTGs of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands and explain the distinctive demographic, epidemiological, ecological and ethical issues involved in their protection. • Structuring the Response: Name all five PVTGs and distinguish them from the Nicobarese; give one diagnostic feature for each; then analyze contact, disease, habitat pressure and policy ethics, emphasizing differentiated protection rather than a uniform development package. • Key Dimensions to Cover: Great Andamanese, Jarawa, Onge, Sentinelese, Shompen; Nicobarese not PVTG; contact-related disease risk; habitat security; Jarawa Policy 2004; minimum intervention; autonomy and differentiated policy. |
Model Answer
Introduction: The Ministry of Tribal Affairs lists five PVTGs in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands - Great Andamanese, Jarawa, Onge, Sentinelese and Shompen. The Nicobarese are a Scheduled Tribe but are not classified as a PVTG. Their vulnerabilities differ sharply, so “one policy for all five” is anthropologically unsound.
| PVTG | Location / adaptive profile | Key concern |
| Great Andamanese | Strait Island; highly acculturated survivors | Demographic collapse and dependency |
| Jarawa | South/Middle Andaman; forest foragers | Contact, road intrusion and disease exposure |
| Onge | Little Andaman; hunter-gatherers | Small population and habitat contraction |
| Sentinelese | North Sentinel Island; autonomous foragers | Protection through non-intrusion |
| Shompen | Interior Great Nicobar; forest-based, mobile economy | Habitat disturbance and limited-contact health risk |
Anthropological priorities
- Epidemiological security: Small, relatively isolated populations may be highly vulnerable to introduced infections; contact must therefore be medically and ethically controlled.
- Habitat as culture: Foraging territories are simultaneously food landscapes, kinship spaces and repositories of ecological knowledge; displacement cannot be reduced to loss of acreage.
- Differentiated autonomy: The Jarawa Policy, 2004 restricts tourist interaction and stresses health/habitat protection. For the Sentinelese, the strongest protection is non-contact; other groups require carefully requested services without forced assimilation.
Conclusion: Island PVTG policy must replace the old isolation-versus-assimilation binary with graded, rights-based protection: secure habitat, prevent intrusive contact, provide culturally appropriate care where accepted, and make community survival and agency - not administrative “mainstreaming” - the criterion of success.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.