VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2019/Paper II/Ethnicity, Tribal Movements & Social Change
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper II 2019 10 Marks Model Answer Available

Anthropological Understanding of Communalism — 2019 Paper II

Question · 2019 · Paper II · 10 Marks

Anthropological understanding of communalism.

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Approach

  • Demand of Question: Explain communalism anthropologically as a process of constructing and politically mobilizing religious group boundaries.
  • Structuring the Response: Distinguish religion from communalism, analyse identity, boundaries and competition, and indicate anthropological ways of understanding conflict.
  • Key Dimensions to Cover: Group identity, Fredrik Barth, boundary formation, stereotypes, political mobilization, competition, syncretism and pluralism.

Model Answer

Introduction: Anthropologically, communalism is not simply religious difference; it is the political and social construction of religious communities as mutually opposed interest groups. It emerges when religious identity becomes a primary basis for boundary formation and political mobilization.

Identity and boundaries: Drawing on Fredrik Barth, communal identities can be understood through the active maintenance of boundaries between “us” and “them”.

These boundaries are reinforced through:

  • symbols;
  • myths of common origin;
  • selective historical memories;
  • stereotypes;
  • ritual distinctions.

Thus:

Religious difference → Boundary construction → Political mobilization → Communalism

Material dimension: Competition over:

  • political representation;
  • employment;
  • land;
  • economic resources

may be expressed in religious language, transforming socio-economic tensions into communal conflict.

Anthropological significance: Ethnography also demonstrates that communities often share:

  • shrines;
  • festivals;
  • occupational networks;
  • neighbourhood relations;
  • syncretic traditions.

Hence communal boundaries are neither natural nor permanently fixed.

Rumours, political entrepreneurs and media can intensify polarization during periods of insecurity.

Conclusion: Anthropology understands communalism as a historically produced and politically mobilized identity process, rather than an inevitable consequence of religious diversity. Everyday interaction and shared cultural practices can simultaneously weaken communal boundaries.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2019 — Paper II

28 questions
Syllabus: Paper II > 9.3 Contributions of anthropology to the understanding of regionalism, communalism and ethnic and political movements
2019Paper IIEthnicity, Tribal Movements & Social ChangeModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 7.3 The concept of ethnicity > Regionalism and demand for autonomy
2019Paper IIEthnicity, Tribal Movements & Social ChangeModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 6.2 Problems of the tribal communities > Low literacy and poor educational facilities
2019Paper IITribal Problems & DisplacementModel answer available