Colonial Administration and Anthropology in India — 2019 Paper II
Write about the role of colonial administration in the development of Anthropology in India.
Model Answer
VAID ICSApproach
- Demand of Question: Explain how British colonial administration contributed to the collection, classification and institutionalization of anthropological knowledge in India.
- Structuring the Response: Discuss censuses, ethnographic surveys, gazetteers and administrator-ethnographers, followed by a critical assessment of colonial biases.
- Key Dimensions to Cover: Census, Ethnographic Survey, Risley, Dalton, Crooke, Thurston, Hutton, tribes and castes, racial classification and colonial knowledge.
Model Answer
Introduction: Anthropology in India developed partly within the requirements of the British colonial administration, which sought systematic knowledge of India’s castes, tribes, customs and physical populations for purposes of governance. Colonial officials consequently produced extensive ethnographic and anthropometric documentation.
- Census operations
The colonial censuses, beginning on an all-India basis in the late nineteenth century, became important sources for studying:
- caste;
- tribe;
- religion;
- language;
- occupation;
- demographic distribution.
Census officials attempted to classify India’s diverse population into standardized categories.
Thus:
Administrative enumeration → Social classification → Ethnographic knowledge
- Ethnographic Survey
The Ethnographic Survey of India, associated particularly with H.H. Risley, encouraged systematic documentation of castes and tribes.
Risley attempted to relate:
- caste rank;
- physical measurements;
- racial type.
His use of the nasal index became influential in colonial racial anthropology.
- District gazetteers and manuals
British administrators prepared:
- district gazetteers;
- settlement reports;
- tribal monographs;
- provincial ethnographies.
These recorded information on:
- kinship;
- marriage;
- customs;
- economy;
- religion;
- political organization.
Despite their biases, these became valuable early ethnographic archives.
- Administrator-ethnographers
Several colonial officials made important contributions:
E.T. Dalton: Descriptive Ethnology of Bengal documented many tribal communities of eastern India.
William Crooke: Studied castes, tribes and popular religion in northern India.
Edgar Thurston: Produced extensive ethnographic descriptions of castes and tribes of southern India.
H.H. Risley: Developed racial-caste classifications using anthropometry.
J.H. Hutton: Census Commissioner and anthropologist who made important studies of Naga tribes and caste.
Administrators such as J.P. Mills also produced detailed Naga ethnographies.
- Physical anthropology
Colonial surveys encouraged:
- anthropometry;
- cranial measurements;
- nasal indices;
- racial classification.
This established an empirical tradition of measurement, later developed more scientifically by Indian anthropologists such as B.S. Guha.
- Tribal administration and anthropology
Knowledge of tribal customs was regarded as necessary for governing frontier and forest regions.
Administrative interest therefore encouraged studies of:
- customary law;
- tribal political institutions;
- land tenure;
- shifting cultivation;
- customary leadership.
- Institutional development
The colonial period also witnessed the gradual institutionalization of anthropology through:
- museums;
- surveys;
- universities;
- ethnographic collections.
The Anthropological Survey of India was established in 1945, providing an important institutional foundation for postcolonial anthropology.
Critical assessment
Colonial anthropology was not politically neutral.
Its major limitations included:
- Administrative orientation: Communities were often studied primarily to facilitate rule.
- Static categories: Fluid social identities were converted into fixed categories of “caste”, “tribe” and “race”.
- Racial determinism: Anthropometry was often used to create questionable racial hierarchies.
- “Tribe-caste” dichotomy: Colonial classifications sometimes exaggerated differences between social groups.
- Orientalist bias: Communities were frequently portrayed as timeless and isolated rather than historically changing.
Hence:
Knowledge production ↔ Colonial governance
Conclusion
Colonial administration provided extensive census, ethnographic, linguistic and anthropometric data and helped institutionalize anthropology in India. However, this development was deeply shaped by administrative requirements and racial-classificatory assumptions. Indian anthropology subsequently inherited this empirical archive while critically moving beyond its colonial and typological biases.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.