Reasons for Caste Violence in India — 2020 Paper II
Explain the reasons of caste violence in India with suitable examples.
Model Answer
VAID ICSApproach
- Demand of Question: Explain the structural, economic, political and cultural causes of caste violence in India with relevant examples.
- Structuring the Response: Link hierarchy, land, mobility and political assertion with dominant-caste backlash, then assess changing forms of caste conflict.
Model Answer
Introduction
Caste violence refers to coercion or collective violence arising from hierarchical status, unequal control over resources and contested caste identities. Though untouchability and caste discrimination are constitutionally prohibited, caste continues to intersect with land, class, gender and political power, creating conditions for conflict.
- Hierarchy and purity-pollution
Traditional caste relations institutionalized unequal status and notions of purity and pollution.
Louis Dumont, in Homo Hierarchicus (1966), emphasized hierarchy as central to caste ideology. When subordinated communities challenge customary restrictions on:
- temple entry;
- access to water;
- public spaces;
- ritual privileges,
such challenges may provoke violence from groups seeking to preserve traditional dominance.
- Land and agrarian inequality
In many villages, caste hierarchy overlaps with unequal landownership.
Landless or marginal Dalit labourers may depend economically on locally powerful cultivating castes.
Conflict may arise over:
- wages;
- tenancy;
- access to common land;
- bonded labour;
- land redistribution.
The Kilvenmani violence (Tamil Nadu, 1968) reflected the intersection of caste hierarchy with agrarian labour conflict.
- Dominant caste and challenged power
M.N. Srinivas’s concept of dominant caste is particularly useful.
Dominance may derive from:
- numerical strength;
- landownership;
- education;
- political organization.
When historically subordinated communities gain education, economic mobility or political representation, the older balance of power may be challenged.
Subordinate caste mobility → Challenge to dominance → Status anxiety → Possible violence
Incidents such as Karamchedu (1985) and Tsundur (1991) in Andhra Pradesh reflected such tensions involving locally powerful castes and Dalits.
- Democratization and political assertion
Universal franchise, reservations and Panchayati Raj have enabled historically disadvantaged groups to:
- contest elections;
- occupy public office;
- organize caste associations;
- demand state resources.
Democratization therefore weakens old monopolies of power but may also produce competitive caste mobilization.
Violence can emerge where political empowerment is perceived as threatening established local elites.
- Sanskritization and status mobility
M.N. Srinivas’s Sanskritization demonstrates that caste rankings can be contested.
Groups claiming:
- higher ritual status;
- new titles;
- changed customs;
- access to previously restricted rituals
may encounter resistance from other groups.
Thus caste violence may involve not only oppression from above but also competition over relative status.
- Inter-caste marriage
Marriage is crucial to maintenance of caste boundaries because caste is reproduced through endogamy.
Inter-caste relationships challenge:
- lineage honour;
- property arrangements;
- caste purity;
- control over women’s sexuality.
Consequently, couples entering inter-caste marriages may face social boycott, coercion or so-called honour-based violence.
- Gender and caste
Caste and patriarchy are closely interconnected.
Control over women’s marriage and sexuality helps reproduce caste boundaries. Violence against women of marginalized castes can therefore function both as gender domination and caste assertion.
- Economic competition
Modernization has generated new arenas of competition over:
- government employment;
- educational opportunities;
- reservations;
- contracts;
- local development resources.
Economic competition may acquire caste form where social networks and political mobilization operate through caste identities.
- Atrocities and assertion
The Khairlanji case (Maharashtra, 2006) highlighted the persistence of violent caste prejudice even amid processes of rural social change.
Similarly, incidents such as Mirchpur (Haryana, 2010) demonstrate that caste violence can persist despite modernization and constitutional safeguards.
- Caste, class and power
André Béteille demonstrated that caste, class and power are analytically distinct but closely interconnected.
Contemporary caste violence often arises where:
Ritual hierarchy + Economic inequality + Political competition
combine within the same local setting.
Changing nature of caste violence
Modernization has weakened some traditional caste restrictions but has not eliminated caste.
The pattern has changed from:
Unquestioned hierarchy → Assertion by subordinate groups → Competitive caste politics
Thus, paradoxically, increased equality and mobility may initially generate conflict because formerly accepted inequalities are increasingly challenged.
Conclusion
Caste violence in India cannot be explained by ritual hierarchy alone. It results from the interaction of status inequality, land relations, political democratization, gender control and competing social mobility. Its reduction requires not only legal protection but substantive transformation of unequal access to land, dignity and political power.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.