VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
+91 93113 37737
  • +91-93113 37737, +91-99999 46748
  • 73(FF), Old Rajender Nagar Market, Delhi - 110060
  • MON to SUN 9.00 am - 6.00 pm
Facebook Youtube Instagram
Menu
Enquire Now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2025/Paper I/Culture & Society
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper I 2025 15 Marks Model Answer Available

Culture as an ‘Integrated-Closed’ System — Drawbacks — 2025 Paper I

Question · 2025 · Paper I · 15 Marks

Critically examine the drawbacks in assuming culture as an 'integrated-closed' system in understanding of contemporary society.

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Introduction

Classical anthropology—dominated by Malinowski’s functionalism and Ruth Benedict’s configurationalism—often studied cultures as bounded, internally consistent, and homeostatic wholes. Eric Wolf famously criticized this as the "Billiard Ball" model of culture, where societies were viewed as solid, isolated spheres that only occasionally bumped into each other. While useful for studying small-scale, relatively isolated societies in the past, this assumption presents severe theoretical and methodological drawbacks for understanding contemporary society.

Drawbacks of the Integrated-Closed System Approach

  1. The Illusion of Homogeneity and Consensus
  • The Issue: A closed-system approach assumes all members share the same values, treating culture as uniformly integrated.
  • The Reality: Contemporary societies are highly stratified. Feminist and Marxist anthropologists argue that portraying culture as harmonious masks internal conflicts, hegemony, and structural violence based on class, caste, race, and gender. (e.g., Lila Abu-Lughod’s concept of "Writing Against Culture").
  1. Blindness to History and Political Economy
  • The Issue: Closed models treat cultures as timeless and static.
  • The Reality: In Europe and the People Without History (1982), Eric Wolf demonstrated that local "isolated" cultures were actually fundamentally shaped by global historical forces like colonialism, capitalism, and the slave trade. A closed view fails to explain historical transformations.
  1. Inadequacy in a Globalized, Transnational World
  • The Issue: It assumes geographic boundaries equal cultural boundaries.
  • The Reality: Culture is now deeply porous and deterritorialized. Arjun Appadurai’s framework of global flows (ethnoscapes, mediascapes, ideoscapes) explains how migration, digital social media, and global markets create transnational identities that completely defy bounded systems.
  1. Neglect of Human Agency (Cultural Determinism)
  • The Issue: Closed systems treat humans as "cultural automatons" who mechanically reproduce norms.
  • The Reality: Practice Theory (Pierre Bourdieu, Sherry Ortner) highlights that humans possess agency. They do not just blindly follow culture; they manipulate, resist, and reinvent it. Homi Bhabha’s concept of hybridity shows how cultures constantly blend and negotiate.

Application in the Indian Context Earlier colonial administrators and scholars like Charles Metcalfe and W.H. Wiser viewed the Indian village as a "closed, integrated little republic" characterized by a harmonious Jajmani system. However, contemporary anthropologists like M.N. Srinivas and Andre Beteille shattered this myth, demonstrating that Indian villages are deeply fractured by caste conflict, outward migration, and deeply integrated into the macro-political economy and global markets.

Critical Evaluation While the ‘integrated’ model is flawed in the modern context, it should not be entirely discarded. Its core principle—Holism—remains a powerful heuristic tool. It reminds anthropologists that institutions are interconnected (e.g., one cannot study modern tribal displacement without understanding their religion and kinship).

Conclusion Contemporary anthropology has shifted from studying culture as a "noun" (a closed thing) to understanding it as a "verb" (a continuous process). Therefore, contemporary society must be analyzed not as a closed ecosystem, but as an open, contested, and dynamic field of meanings heavily influenced by global flows and internal power dynamics.

2025 Culture and embodiment. 2025 Describe briefly the theoretical perspectives in linguistic anthropology to explain the relationship of culture, language and thought. 2024 Attributes of culture 2024 Examine critically the concept of social stratification as a basis for sustaining social inequality.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

Join Workshop Contact VAID ICS

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2025 — Paper I

28 questions

1(e) Culture and embodiment.

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Nature of Culture > Contemporary Culture Concepts > Embodiment; body and culture
2025Paper ICulture & SocietyModel answer available

1(a) Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Mendelian Genetics in Man > Mendelian and non-Mendelian inheritance
2025Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available

1(c) Osteodontokeratik culture and its makers.

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Prehistoric Archaeology > Early Tool Traditions > Osteodontokeratic culture; australopithecine makers
2025Paper IPrehistoric ArchaeologyAnswer coming soon