Syllabus: Paper I > Prehistoric Archaeology > Lower Palaeolithic > Oldowan and Acheulian traditions
Social Stratification and Social Inequality — 2024 Paper I
Question · 2024 · Paper I · 20 Marks
Examine critically the concept of social stratification as a basis for sustaining social inequality.
Model Answer
VAID ICSIntroduction
Social stratification is the institutionalised ranking of individuals and groups into unequal layers based on wealth, power, prestige and social identity. According to Melvin Tumin, it involves the arrangement of social groups in a hierarchy of unequal power, property and social evaluation.
Unlike social differentiation, which merely recognises differences of age, sex or occupation, stratification attaches unequal rewards and life chances to such differences and reproduces them across generations.
Forms of Social Stratification
Stratification has appeared historically as:
- slavery based on ownership of persons;
- estate systems based on legally defined ranks;
- caste based on birth, endogamy and hereditary occupation;
- class based mainly on economic position;
- gender and ethnic hierarchies cutting across these systems.
These forms differ in rigidity, but all regulate access to socially valued resources.
How Stratification Sustains Inequality
Control over economic resources
Karl Marx located inequality in ownership of the means of production. The dominant class controls property and appropriates surplus, while workers remain dependent upon wages. Economic advantage is transmitted through inheritance.
Unequal life chances
Max Weber viewed stratification through class, status and party. Economic position determines market opportunities, status provides social honour and party provides political influence. Thus, inequality is multidimensional.
Social closure
Privileged groups protect advantages through endogamy, exclusive networks, educational credentials and occupational monopolies. Such closure converts inherited privilege into apparently legitimate achievement.
Cultural reproduction
Pierre Bourdieu argued that dominant groups transmit economic, social and cultural capital. Their language, tastes and educational exposure are rewarded by schools and institutions, making inequality appear merit-based.
Ideological legitimation
Religious beliefs, ideas of purity, merit or natural superiority may justify hierarchy. Gramsci’s concept of hegemony explains how dominant values become accepted as common sense even by subordinate groups.
Kinship and inheritance
Marriage rules, descent and property transmission reproduce rank. Endogamy preserves caste boundaries, while patrilineal inheritance may perpetuate gender inequality.
Anthropological Illustrations
In India, Louis Dumont explained caste hierarchy through purity and pollution. However, B.R. Ambedkar viewed caste as a system of graded inequality, sustained primarily by endogamy and social exclusion.
André Béteille’s Caste, Class and Power (1965), based on Sripuram, showed that ritual status, landownership and political power may overlap, but are not always identical. This demonstrates that inequality is produced through interacting hierarchies rather than caste alone.
Gender stratification similarly operates through unequal division of labour, restricted mobility and differential control over property and decision-making.
Critical Perspectives
Davis and Moore (1945) argued that stratification is functionally necessary because unequal rewards attract talented persons to socially important positions.
Tumin criticised this argument because:
- the importance of occupations cannot be measured objectively;
- unequal opportunities prevent the discovery of talent;
- inherited privilege, rather than ability, often determines rewards;
- excessive inequality weakens social integration.
Conflict theory rightly exposes domination but may overemphasise economic class and underestimate status, culture and social mobility.
Stratification is also not completely static. Education, migration, democratic politics, social movements and affirmative action may promote mobility. However, Sanskritisation, identified by M.N. Srinivas, may improve a group’s rank without dismantling the hierarchical system itself.
Conclusion
Social stratification sustains inequality by transforming social differences into ranked identities and reproducing them through property, endogamy, institutions, cultural capital and ideology. Inequality persists not merely because resources are unequally distributed, but because such distribution is legitimised and transmitted across generations. Therefore, stratification must be examined as a dynamic relationship between structure, power and resistance.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.
UPSC Anthropology Optional 2024 — Paper I
28 questionsSyllabus: Paper I > Applications of Anthropology > Forensic Anthropology > Applications and personal identification
1(a) Attributes of culture
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Nature of Culture > Characteristics of Culture > Attributes of culture
5(d) Authority and forms of political organization
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Political Organization and Social Control > Power, Authority and Legitimacy > Band, tribe, chiefdom, state
1(c) Critical perspective on avoidance and joking relationship
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Kinship > Kinship Behaviour > Avoidance and joking relationships
5(a) Chronometric dating
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Prehistoric Archaeology > Chronology and Dating > Chronometric (absolute) dating methods
Syllabus: Paper I > Research Methods > Fieldwork Tradition > Contemporary challenges in fieldwork
5(b) Cultural relevance of the Kula
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Economic Organization > Reciprocity and Exchange > Kula ring
Syllabus: Paper I > Anthropological Theories > Post-Modernism > Deconstruction; Derrida
Syllabus: Paper I > Prehistoric Archaeology > Neolithic > Origin of food production; domestication; Mehrgarh
Syllabus: Paper I > Applications of Anthropology > Applied Human Genetics > Genetic counselling
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Blood Group Systems > ABO and Rh inheritance
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Evolution > Fossil Hominids > Homo erectus: distribution and phylogenetic status
1(b) Harappan maritime trade
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Prehistoric Archaeology > Chalcolithic and Bronze Age > Harappan civilization; maritime trade
1(e) Hemoglobin in health and disease
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Genetic Polymorphism > Haemoglobinopathies; health and disease
5(c) Heritability and its estimation
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Quantitative Genetics > Heritability and its estimation
2(a) Discuss historical particularism as a critical development to the classical evolutionism.
20 Marks
Syllabus: Paper I > Anthropological Theories > Historical Particularism > Critique of classical evolutionism
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Chromosomes and Chromosomal Aberrations > Karyotyping
1(d) Lethal and sublethal genes
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Mendelian Genetics in Man > Lethal and sublethal genes
Syllabus: Paper I > Anthropological Theories > Structuralism > Levi-Strauss; myth analysis; Asdiwal
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Biology > Epidemiological and Nutritional Anthropology > Lifestyle diseases
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Quantitative Genetics > Multifactorial inheritance
Syllabus: Paper I > Anthropological Theories > Culture and Personality > Ruth Benedict; configurational approach
Syllabus: Paper I > Research Methods > Tools of Data Collection > Sampling techniques
5(e) Single-gene mutation disorders in man
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Mutation and Genetic Disorders > Single-gene disorders
Syllabus: Paper I > Nature of Society > Social Groups, Status and Role > Social stratification and inequality
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Evolution > Biological and Cultural Factors > Bio-cultural synergy in human evolution
Syllabus: Paper I > Family > Impact of Change on Family > Urbanisation and the family