VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
+91 93113 37737
  • +91-93113 37737, +91-99999 46748
  • 73(FF), Old Rajender Nagar Market, Delhi - 110060
  • MON to SUN 9.00 am - 6.00 pm
Facebook Youtube Instagram
Menu
Enquire Now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2025/Paper I/Anthropology of Religion
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper I 2025 15 Marks Model Answer Available

James Frazer’s Theory of Evolutionism and Religion in Modernity — 2025 Paper I

Question · 2025 · Paper I · 15 Marks

Critically examine James Frazer's theory of evolutionism. Elucidate the place of religion in modernity.

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Introduction Sir James George Frazer, in his monumental work The Golden Bough (1890), proposed a unilinear evolutionary framework for the development of human thought. As a classical British evolutionist, Frazer argued that human intellect evolved sequentially through three stages:

  1. Frazer’s Evolutionary FrameworkFrazer hypothesized that early humans sought to control nature to survive, leading to three chronological stages:
  • The Age of Magic: Primitive man believed he could manipulate nature through the "Law of Sympathy." This took two forms:
    • Homeopathic (Similarity) Magic: "Like produces like" (e.g., destroying a voodoo doll to harm an enemy).
    • Contagious (Contact) Magic: "Once in contact, always in contact" (e.g., using a person's hair for a spell).
  • The Age of Religion: When humans realized that magic failed to consistently control nature, they recognized their own impotence. They then turned to propitiating and pleasing higher supernatural beings (gods/spirits) to intervene on their behalf.
  • The Age of Science: Finally, humans discovered the true, empirical laws of nature. Science, according to Frazer, replaces the false premises of magic and the unscientific reliance on religion.
  1. Critical Examination of Frazer’s TheoryWhile Frazer successfully systematized the study of myths and rituals, his theory suffers from severe anthropological flaws:
  • Armchair Speculation: Frazer relied on out-of-context accounts from missionaries and travelers, lacking empirical fieldwork.
  • Simultaneous Coexistence, Not Sequential: Bronisław Malinowski, through his fieldwork among the Trobriand Islanders, proved that magic, religion, and practical science do not exist in separate evolutionary stages. The islanders used practical science to build canoes, and magic to ensure safety in the unpredictable open ocean.
  • Misunderstanding Magic: E.E. Evans-Pritchard’s study of the Azande showed that magic is not "false science" or primitive stupidity, but a highly logical system used to explain the "why" of unfortunate events.
  • Ignoring Social Reality: Emile Durkheim criticized Frazer for treating religion merely as an intellectual mistake, ignoring its primary function: creating social solidarity.
  1. The Place of Religion in ModernityFrazer predicted that modernity and science would inevitably lead to the death of religion (the Secularization Thesis). Modern sociology and anthropology prove this assumption entirely wrong:
  • Functional Differentiation: Science and religion answer different questions. Science explains how the universe works, while religion explains why we are here. They comfortably coexist. (e.g., ISRO scientists seeking blessings at Tirupati before a satellite launch).
  • Existential Anchor: Modernity brings alienation, rapid change, and anxiety. Religion provides psychological comfort, ethical frameworks, and meaning regarding death—areas where science is silent.
  • Resurgence and Identity: In a globalized world, religion has become a powerful marker of ethnic and national identity. It is an active public force in politics, social movements, and even conflicts.
  • Technological Adaptation: Religion has not been defeated by technology; it has co-opted it. The rise of digital darshan, online congregations, and televangelism shows religion's immense adaptability.

Conclusion Frazer’s unilinear triad of Magic-Religion-Science is an obsolete, ethnocentric construct. Modernity has proven that religion is not a "primitive survival" destined to be replaced by science, but a dynamic, ever-evolving cultural institution that fulfills enduring human psychological and social needs.

2026 Myth as oral literature. 2026 How do religious beliefs help people to devise cultural mechanisms to adapt to their environment? Discuss in detail with appropriate examples. 2023 How did Clifford Geertz look at religion ? Differentiate between anthropological and psychological approaches to the study of religion. 2022 Shaman, sorcerer and medicine man.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

Join Workshop Contact VAID ICS

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2025 — Paper I

28 questions

1(e) Culture and embodiment.

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Nature of Culture > Contemporary Culture Concepts > Embodiment; body and culture
2025Paper ICulture & SocietyModel answer available

1(a) Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Mendelian Genetics in Man > Mendelian and non-Mendelian inheritance
2025Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available

1(c) Osteodontokeratik culture and its makers.

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Prehistoric Archaeology > Early Tool Traditions > Osteodontokeratic culture; australopithecine makers
2025Paper IPrehistoric ArchaeologyAnswer coming soon