5(d) Anthropometry in ergonomics.
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Applications of Anthropology > Ergonomics > Anthropometry
Myth as Oral Literature — 2026 Paper I
Question · 2026 · Paper I · 10 Marks
Myth as oral literature.
Model Answer
VAID ICS| Approach
· Demand of Question: Explain myth as a form of oral literature and performance and show its social, symbolic and cognitive significance. · Structuring the Response: Define myth -> oral transmission/performance -> Malinowski social charter -> Lévi-Strauss structural analysis -> memory/identity -> critical note on variation -> conclusion. Key Dimensions to Cover: Orality, performance, sacred/authoritative narrative, Malinowski, social charter, Lévi-Strauss, binary oppositions, collective memory, identity and contextual variation. |
Model Answer
Introduction: In anthropology, a myth is an authoritative cultural narrative concerning origins, ancestors, sacred events or the moral order. As oral literature, it is sustained through narration, memory and performance rather than through a single fixed written text.
- Oral transmission: Myths pass across generations through recognised narrators, households and ritual occasions. Variation in sequence, emphasis and imagery does not destroy the cultural core; performance, gesture, music and audience may themselves contribute to meaning.
- Malinowski - myth as social charter: From Trobriand ethnography, Malinowski argued that myth validates institutions, customary rights, ritual practices and moral expectations. It is therefore lived social reality, not merely entertainment.
- Lévi-Strauss - structural meaning: In “The Structural Study of Myth” (1955), Lévi-Strauss analysed myths as transformations of underlying relations and oppositions such as nature/culture, life/death or raw/cooked.
- Collective memory and identity: Myths preserve clan origins, sacred geography, moral values, ecological knowledge and political legitimacy. They may define group boundaries and connect the present to an ancestral past.
Critical note: Myth is not universally sacred in the same form, and oral traditions are historically dynamic. Their anthropological “truth” lies in the authority, relations and meanings they carry for participants, not in literal empirical verification.
Conclusion: Myth as oral literature is simultaneously narrative, performance, social charter and symbolic mode of thought.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.
UPSC Anthropology Optional 2026 — Paper I
28 questionsSyllabus: Paper I > Culture and Personality > Basic personality structure > National character
1(b) Canalization and catch-up growth.
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Growth and Development > Growth patterns > Canalization and catch-up growth
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Mendelian inheritance in man > Pedigree analysis
8(a) Compare Edmund Leach's structuralism with interpretive anthropology of Clifford Geertz.
20 Marks
Syllabus: Paper I > Anthropological Theories > Structuralism and interpretive anthropology > Leach and Geertz
5(a) Ethics in anthropological fieldwork.
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Research Methods > Fieldwork > Ethics in fieldwork
1(e) Ethnoarchaeology and classical archaeology.
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Archaeological Anthropology > Approaches > Ethnoarchaeology and classical archaeology
5(c) Feminist movement and family.
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Family > Contemporary trends > Feminist movement and family
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Biology > Demography > Fertility and mortality
1(d) Genetic polymorphism and natural selection.
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Genetic polymorphism > Natural selection
1(a) Health as a cultural construct.
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Applications of Anthropology > Medical Anthropology > Culture and health
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Evolution > Biological and cultural factors > Biocultural evolution
4(b) Discuss 'incest taboo' as the basis of development of kinship systems in human societies.
15 Marks
Syllabus: Paper I > Kinship > Incest taboo > Development of kinship systems
Syllabus: Paper I > Anthropological Theories > Neo-evolutionism > Leslie White and culturology
Syllabus: Paper I > Palaeolithic Cultures > Upper Palaeolithic > Magdalenian tradition
Syllabus: Paper I > Research Methods > Methodology > Mixed methods
1(c) Myth as oral literature.
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Religion, Myth and Ritual > Myth > Myth as oral literature
5(b) Distinguishing features of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA.
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > DNA > Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Chromosomal aberrations > Numerical aberrations
Syllabus: Paper I > Palaeolithic Cultures > Distribution > Himalayan and Sub-Himalayan sites
Syllabus: Paper I > Fossil Hominids > Australopithecines > Paranthropus
Syllabus: Paper I > Political Organization and Social Control > Power and authority > Change with political organization
Syllabus: Paper I > Religion > Functions of religion > Cultural adaptation to environment
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Applied genetics > Serogenetics, cytogenetics and reproductive technology
Syllabus: Paper I > Applications of Anthropology > Sports Anthropology > Somatotyping and the Heath-Carter method
Syllabus: Paper I > Primatology > Primate taxonomy > Strepsirhini and Haplorhini
2(c) How is the theory of structuralism helpful in understanding the concepts of caste and gender?
15 Marks
Syllabus: Paper I > Anthropological Theories > Structuralism > Application to caste and gender
5(e) Thermoluminescence dating method.
10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Archaeological Anthropology > Dating methods > Thermoluminescence