VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2014/Paper II/Tribal Development, Policy & Safeguards
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper II 2014 15 Marks Model Answer Available

National Tribal Policy — 2014 Paper II

Question · 2014 · Paper II · 15 Marks

Critically evaluate the National Tribal Policy.

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Approach

  • Demand of Question: Examine the objectives and major provisions of the proposed National Tribal Policy and critically assess its capacity to address structural tribal problems.
  • Structuring the Response: Present its broad policy priorities, identify its strengths, and then examine limitations relating to implementation, participation and resource rights.
  • Key Dimensions to Cover: Draft National Tribal Policy 2006, land, displacement, forest rights, PVTGs, education, health, self-governance, cultural identity and implementation gaps.

Model Answer

Introduction: The Draft National Tribal Policy, 2006 sought to provide an integrated framework for the development and protection of India's Scheduled Tribes. It recognized that tribal deprivation was linked not merely to poverty but also to land alienation, displacement, loss of forest access and erosion of cultural autonomy.

Major concerns of the policy

The proposed policy emphasized:

  • protection of tribal land;
  • prevention of exploitation;
  • improved rehabilitation of displaced tribes;
  • education and health;
  • livelihood security;
  • protection of traditional knowledge;
  • development of PVTGs;
  • preservation of tribal culture and identity;
  • strengthening of tribal administration.

Its broad orientation can be represented as:

Protection + Development + Participation + Cultural preservation

Strengths

  1. Holistic approach:
    It treated tribal development as more than welfare expenditure.
  2. Recognition of land and resource rights:
    It acknowledged land alienation as a central cause of tribal impoverishment.
  3. Focus on displacement:
    It recognized the disproportionate impact of dams, mining and industries on tribal communities.
  4. Attention to vulnerable groups:
    Special emphasis was placed on:
  • PVTGs;
  • tribal women;
  • remote communities.
  1. Cultural sensitivity:
    It recognized the need to protect:
  • customary institutions;
  • languages;
  • indigenous knowledge.

This broadly resonates with Verrier Elwin's Tribal Panchsheel, which advocated development in accordance with tribal social and cultural institutions.

Limitations

  1. Implementation deficit:
    Policy intentions depend heavily on state-level administrative commitment.
  2. Weak community participation:
    Development may still remain bureaucratically designed rather than genuinely Gram Sabha-led.
  3. Conflict between development and resource rights:
    Mining, infrastructure and industrial priorities may contradict protection of tribal land.
  4. Institutional fragmentation:
    Responsibilities are distributed among:
  • Tribal Affairs;
  • Forest departments;
  • state governments;
  • local administration,

creating coordination problems.

  1. Insufficient emphasis on autonomy:
    Welfare-oriented approaches may overshadow the constitutional principle of tribal self-governance under the Fifth and Sixth Schedules and PESA.
  2. Policy status:
    The 2006 proposal did not mature into a fully implemented comprehensive National Tribal Policy, limiting its operational impact.

Conclusion

The National Tribal Policy framework correctly identified the central tribal issues of land, forests, displacement, cultural identity and human development. Its weakness lies in translating these principles into enforceable rights and participatory governance. Tribal policy becomes meaningful only when communities move from being beneficiaries of development to decision-makers over their own resources and future.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2014 — Paper II

28 questions
Syllabus: Paper II > 6.3 Development of forest policy and tribals
2014Paper IITribal Problems & DisplacementModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 5.3 Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change > Interplay of little and great traditions
2014Paper IIVillage India, Urbanisation & Social ChangeModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 8.1 Impact of Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam and other religions on tribal societies > Christianity
2014Paper IIEthnicity, Tribal Movements & Social ChangeModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 2. Demographic profile of India > Linguistic elements and their distribution
2014Paper IIIndian Society, Caste & CivilizationModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 1.1 Evolution of Indian Culture and Civilization > Neolithic > North-East India
2014Paper IIPrehistoric ArchaeologyModel answer available

5(d) The concept of PTG

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 9.1 The concept of PTGs (Primitive Tribal Groups) > Distribution and special programmes
2014Paper IITribal Development, Policy & SafeguardsModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 3.2 Caste system in India > Tribe-caste continuum
2014Paper IIIndian Society, Caste & CivilizationModel answer available