VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2014/Paper II/Indian Society, Caste & Civilization
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper II 2014 10 Marks Model Answer Available

H. H. Risley and the ‘Aryan’ Debate — 2014 Paper II

Question · 2014 · Paper II · 10 Marks

Contribution of H. H. Risley to the 'Aryan' debate

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Approach

  • Demand of Question: Explain Risley’s anthropometric contribution to the colonial debate on Aryan origins and racial composition of Indian populations.
  • Structuring the Response: Present his methodology and Aryan–Dravidian interpretation, followed by a brief critical appraisal from modern anthropology.
  • Key Dimensions to Cover: H.H. Risley, nasal index, anthropometry, Indo-Aryan type, caste hierarchy, Aryan-Dravidian theory and criticism of racial typology.

Model Answer

Introduction: H.H. Risley, a colonial administrator and ethnographer, made an influential but now outdated contribution to the debate on the racial composition of India and the supposed relationship between Aryan migration and caste hierarchy.

Risley relied heavily on anthropometry, particularly the nasal index:

Nasal breadth / Nasal height × 100

He classified Indian populations into several “racial types,” including:

  • Indo-Aryan;
  • Dravidian;
  • Aryo-Dravidian;
  • Mongoloid and mixed types.

Risley argued that the so-called Aryan population entering northwestern India possessed relatively narrow noses and became socially dominant over indigenous populations.

He further attempted to establish a correlation between:

Higher caste rank → Greater supposed Aryan physical characteristics

and associated broader nasal forms with lower social rank.

His work strengthened the colonial Aryan–Dravidian racial model.

However, modern anthropology rejects such rigid racial classification because:

  • human variation is continuous;
  • caste and biological ancestry do not correspond simply;
  • Indian populations show extensive historical admixture.

Conclusion: Risley was important historically for introducing systematic anthropometry into Indian ethnography, but his Aryan interpretation reflects colonial racial typology rather than contemporary population genetics.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2014 — Paper II

28 questions
Syllabus: Paper II > 6.3 Development of forest policy and tribals
2014Paper IITribal Problems & DisplacementModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 5.3 Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change > Interplay of little and great traditions
2014Paper IIVillage India, Urbanisation & Social ChangeModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 8.1 Impact of Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam and other religions on tribal societies > Christianity
2014Paper IIEthnicity, Tribal Movements & Social ChangeModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 2. Demographic profile of India > Linguistic elements and their distribution
2014Paper IIIndian Society, Caste & CivilizationModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 1.1 Evolution of Indian Culture and Civilization > Neolithic > North-East India
2014Paper IIPrehistoric ArchaeologyModel answer available

5(d) The concept of PTG

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 9.1 The concept of PTGs (Primitive Tribal Groups) > Distribution and special programmes
2014Paper IITribal Development, Policy & SafeguardsModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper II > 3.2 Caste system in India > Tribe-caste continuum
2014Paper IIIndian Society, Caste & CivilizationModel answer available