History of Tribal Administration in the Colonial Period — 2014 Paper II
Describe the history of tribal administration in the colonial period.
Model Answer
VAID ICSApproach
- Demand of Question: In the context of this tribal-development section, trace the evolution of British administration of tribal areas during the colonial period.
- Structuring the Response: Move chronologically from early revenue expansion and tribal resistance to non-regulation areas, excluded/partially excluded areas and late colonial administrative arrangements.
- Key Dimensions to Cover: Permanent Settlement, tribal rebellions, Regulation XIII of 1833, Scheduled Districts Act 1874, Government of India Acts 1919 and 1935, excluded areas and isolationist administration.
Model Answer
Introduction: British administration of tribal areas evolved gradually from attempts at revenue extraction and extension of ordinary laws toward special administrative arrangements based on partial exclusion and indirect control. This change was largely a response to repeated tribal resistance and the difficulty of applying plains administration to tribal regions.
- Early colonial intervention
Expansion of British revenue administration disrupted traditional tribal relations with:
- land;
- forests;
- chiefs;
- community resources.
Introduction of:
- landlords;
- moneylenders;
- traders;
- new revenue systems
contributed to land alienation and indebtedness.
Thus:
Colonial penetration → Resource alienation → Tribal resistance
- Tribal rebellions and administrative response
Numerous uprisings demonstrated the inadequacy of ordinary administration.
Important examples include:
- Kol uprising (1831–32);
- Santhal rebellion (1855–56);
- Munda Ulgulan (1899–1900).
These movements forced colonial authorities to recognize the distinctive conditions of tribal areas.
- Regulation XIII of 1833
Following disturbances in Chotanagpur, Regulation XIII of 1833 created the South-West Frontier Agency.
Certain areas were removed from ordinary regulatory administration and placed under special arrangements.
This marked movement toward the non-regulation system.
- Scheduled Districts Act, 1874
The Scheduled Districts Act, 1874 identified backward and difficult areas where ordinary laws could be modified or selectively applied.
Administration became increasingly differentiated between:
Regular provinces ↔ Special tribal/frontier areas
- Forest legislation
Colonial forest policies, particularly under the Forest Acts of:
- 1865;
- 1878;
- 1927,
expanded state ownership and control over forests.
This restricted traditional practices such as:
- shifting cultivation;
- hunting;
- grazing;
- collection of forest produce.
Forest administration consequently became an important source of tribal grievance.
- Government of India Act, 1919
The Act recognized certain Backward Tracts, which received differentiated administrative treatment.
This further institutionalized the idea that some tribal areas should remain outside normal provincial administration.
- Government of India Act, 1935
A more systematic classification emerged under the Government of India Act, 1935 through:
- Excluded Areas;
- Partially Excluded Areas.
In Excluded Areas, provincial legislatures had little direct authority and administration remained substantially under the Governor.
In Partially Excluded Areas, provincial laws could operate subject to special restrictions.
Thus:
Tribal distinctiveness → Administrative exclusion rather than political integration
Nature of colonial policy
Colonial administration broadly oscillated between:
- intervention for revenue and resources;
- isolation for administrative convenience.
It rarely aimed at genuine tribal self-government.
The policy sought chiefly to maintain:
- political order;
- frontier security;
- access to natural resources.
Impact
Colonial administration produced lasting consequences:
- land alienation;
- restrictions on forest rights;
- weakening of customary institutions;
- indebtedness;
- tribal rebellions.
At the same time, recognition of the distinct administrative requirements of tribal areas later influenced constitutional arrangements such as the Fifth and Sixth Schedules.
Conclusion
The history of colonial administration of tribal areas moved from unregulated economic penetration to special administrative exclusion. Measures such as the Scheduled Districts Act and the excluded-area system recognized tribal distinctiveness, but were primarily designed for colonial control rather than participatory tribal development or autonomy.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.