Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups — 2017 Paper II
Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (earlier known as PTG).
Model Answer
VAID ICSApproach
- Demand of Question:Define PVTGs, explain criteria, distributional-administrative rationale and special development approach, while updating the older PTG terminology.
- Structuring the Response:Origin/renaming -> four criteria -> number/distribution -> vulnerabilities -> policy shift from generic welfare to habitat/community-specific saturation. • Key Dimensions to Cover: Dhebar Commission background, PTG category from 1975, renamed PVTG in 2006; 75 groups in 18 states and A&N Islands; criteria; CCD Plans; habitat rights; PM-JANMAN (2023-24) as current value addition.
Model Answer
Introduction Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) are a sub-classification of Scheduled Tribes requiring highly focused policy intervention. Created on the recommendation of the Dhebar Commission (1973) as "Primitive Tribal Groups" (PTGs), the terminology was anthropologically corrected to PVTG in 2006 to remove pejorative undertones.
Body Identification Criteria: The government identifies PVTGs based on four specific traits:
- Pre-agricultural level of technology (e.g., hunting-gathering).
- Stagnant or declining population.
- Extremely low literacy.
- Subsistence-level economy. Currently, there are 75 PVTGs spread across 18 states and the Andaman & Nicobar Islands (e.g., Sentinelese, Baiga, Dongria Kondh, Sahariya).
Anthropological Vulnerabilities & Policy Shift: PVTGs suffer from compounded vulnerabilities including genetic bottlenecks (due to small populations), rapid loss of traditional ecological knowledge, and extreme nutritional stress. Generic tribal welfare often fails to reach them due to their remoteness and lack of political voice.
Consequently, policy has shifted from uniform welfare to targeted saturation. The PM-JANMAN (2023) initiative is a landmark ₹24,000-crore scheme designed to saturate PVTG habitations with 11 critical interventions (safe housing, clean water, mobile connectivity, and health).
Conclusion Anthropologically, the development of PVTGs must avoid forced assimilation or paternalistic isolation. Interventions like PM-JANMAN must operate strictly alongside the recognition of their Habitat Rights (under the Forest Rights Act, 2006), ensuring that development is culturally appropriate and driven by community consent.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.