VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2020/Paper I/Economic & Political Anthropology
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper I 2020 15 Marks Model Answer Available

Power, Conspicuous Consumption and Distributive Justice — 2020 Paper I

Question · 2020 · Paper I · 15 Marks

How is the construct of power linked to the notion of conspicuous consumption and its impact on distributive justice ?

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Approach

  • Demand of Question: Explain how control over resources and social power generate conspicuous consumption, and evaluate its implications for distributive justice.
  • Structuring the Response: Link power, prestige and consumption through Veblen and Bourdieu, then assess inequality, redistribution and anthropological examples.

Model Answer

Introduction

Power involves the capacity to control resources, influence others and shape social outcomes. Thorstein Veblen, in The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899), used the concept of conspicuous consumption to describe visible expenditure undertaken primarily to demonstrate wealth, status and prestige.

Power and conspicuous consumption

Control over surplus enables elites to convert economic resources into symbolic demonstrations of superiority.

Thus:

Control over resources → Surplus wealth → Conspicuous consumption → Prestige → Legitimation of power

Expensive houses, ceremonies, clothing, vehicles and luxury goods can therefore become markers of hierarchy rather than merely objects of utility.

Consumption as distinction

Pierre Bourdieu, in Distinction (1979), showed that consumption patterns communicate taste and social position.

Dominant groups possess not merely economic capital but also:

  • social capital;
  • cultural capital;
  • symbolic capital.

Consumption therefore contributes to the reproduction of class boundaries.

Anthropological examples

Prestige economies reveal that consumption and distribution are often politically connected.

Potlatch among Northwest Coast peoples: Chiefs historically demonstrated status through large ceremonial distributions and competitive giving.

Here:

Accumulation → Ceremonial redistribution → Prestige and political authority

Similarly, Marcel Mauss’s analysis of gift exchange showed that apparently economic transfers also create obligations, alliances and prestige.

Impact on distributive justice

Conspicuous consumption can adversely affect distributive justice when:

  1. Resources become concentrated: A small elite controls a disproportionate share of wealth.
  2. Consumption becomes positional: Social status increasingly depends upon goods inaccessible to poorer groups.
  3. Inequality becomes visible: Luxury expenditure alongside deprivation intensifies perceptions of relative inequality.
  4. Power reproduces advantage: Wealth provides better access to education, political influence and social networks, enabling privilege to persist across generations.
  5. Public priorities may be distorted: Elite influence may direct resources towards prestige projects or private benefits rather than wider social needs.

Redistribution and counterpoint

Conspicuous expenditure does not always simply hoard wealth. In systems such as ceremonial feasting or potlatch, prestige competition may involve significant redistribution of goods.

Therefore its social effect depends on whether expenditure:

Concentrates resources or redistributes resources through socially recognized obligations.

Distributive justice

Distributive justice concerns the fair allocation of:

  • wealth;
  • opportunities;
  • public goods;
  • social burdens.

Where power allows privileged groups to monopolize these resources, conspicuous consumption becomes both a symbol and mechanism of inequality.

Conclusion

Power and conspicuous consumption are closely linked because elites can convert material surplus into prestige and symbolic authority. While some prestige systems redistribute resources, unchecked conspicuous consumption generally reinforces social differentiation and can undermine distributive justice by converting economic inequality into enduring social power.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2020 — Paper I

28 questions
Syllabus: Paper I > 12. Applications of Anthropology > Applied human genetics and eugenics
2020Paper IApplied & Forensic AnthropologyModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper I > 8.1 Research Methods > Fieldwork tradition and ethnography
2020Paper IResearch Methods in AnthropologyModel answer available

5(b) Genetic drift

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > 9.3 Mendelian population and Hardy-Weinberg law > Genetic drift
2020Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available

1(a) Natufian culture

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > 1.8(b) Cultural Evolution: broad outlines of prehistoric cultures > Mesolithic > Natufian
2020Paper IPrehistoric ArchaeologyModel answer available

5(a) Racism and Eugenics

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > 9.5 Race and racism > Racial differentiation; eugenics
2020Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper I > 7. Culture, language and communication > Language and thought
2020Paper ICulture & SocietyModel answer available

5(e) Senescence

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > 10. Human growth and development > Ageing and senescence
2020Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper I > 6. Anthropological Theories > Symbolic Anthropology > Turner; liminality
2020Paper IAnthropological TheoriesModel answer available