Animism and Deep Ecology — 2021 Paper I
Animism and Deep Ecology
Model Answer
VAID ICSApproach
- Demand of Question: Explain Animism and Deep Ecology and establish the relationship between the two.
- Structuring the Response: Define both concepts, explain their major features, and then compare their similarities and differences.
- Key Dimensions to Cover: Tylor, Hallowell, Bird-David, Arne Næss; personhood, reciprocity, biospherical egalitarianism and human–nature interconnectedness.
Model Answer
Introduction
E.B. Tylor, in Primitive Culture (1871), defined Animism as the “belief in spiritual beings,” referring to the attribution of soul, spirit or agency to humans and elements of the natural world. The term Deep Ecology was introduced by Norwegian philosopher Arne Næss in his 1973 article, “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement: A Summary,” to describe an ecological perspective that rejects human-centred domination and views humans as part of an interconnected biosphere.
Animism
Tylor explained animism through experiences such as dreams, death and visions, which led humans to conceptualise souls and spirits.
Later anthropologists broadened the concept:
- A. Irving Hallowell, in “Ojibwa Ontology, Behavior and World View” (1960), showed that the Ojibwa recognised certain natural beings as “other-than-human persons.”
- Nurit Bird-David, in “Animism Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology” (1999), based on the Nayaka of South India, interpreted animism as a relational epistemology in which humans understand their environment through reciprocal relationships.
Personhood → Relationship → Reciprocity → Interconnectedness
Deep Ecology
Næss distinguished between:
- Shallow Ecology: protection of the environment largely for human health, prosperity and resource security.
- Deep Ecology: transformation of the human relationship with the entire ecological community.
Its major principles include:
- Biospherical egalitarianism – humans are not inherently superior to other life.
- Relationality – organisms exist within networks of ecological relationships.
- Diversity and symbiosis – biological diversity has ecological significance.
- Value beyond utility – non-human life cannot be reduced merely to a resource for humans.
- Limited human interference with ecological processes.
Arne Næss and George Sessions (1984) later articulated the Eight-Point Deep Ecology Platform, emphasising the flourishing of human and non-human life and preservation of diversity.
Animism and Deep Ecology
| Animism | Deep Ecology |
| Cultural/cosmological worldview | Modern ecological philosophy |
| Non-humans may possess spirit, agency or personhood | Non-human nature has value beyond human utility |
| Emphasises relationships and reciprocity | Emphasises ecological interconnectedness |
| Example: Ojibwa, Nayaka | Normative environmental ethic |
Thus, both question the sharp human–nature dichotomy and anthropocentric treatment of nature. However, animism is an emic and culturally embedded ontology, whereas Deep Ecology is a consciously formulated philosophical and ethical position.
Conclusion
Animism and Deep Ecology converge in locating humans within a larger community of life. Anthropology, however, distinguishes the lived relational cosmology of animistic societies from the modern ecological ethics formulated by Deep Ecology.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.