VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
+91 93113 37737
  • +91-93113 37737, +91-99999 46748
  • 73(FF), Old Rajender Nagar Market, Delhi - 110060
  • MON to SUN 9.00 am - 6.00 pm
Facebook Youtube Instagram
Menu
Enquire Now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2024/Paper II/Foundations of Anthropology
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper II 2024 15 Marks Model Answer Available

Colonial History of Indian Anthropology — 2024 Paper II

Question · 2024 · Paper II · 15 Marks

Deconstruct the colonial history of Indian Anthropology highlighting the critical role played by the Indian Anthropologists in sustaining its autonomy.

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Introduction Indian Anthropology was born in the crucible of colonial administration. It initially emerged not as a pure academic pursuit, but as a pragmatic tool for British administrators to govern, tax, and police a vast, diverse sub-continent. However, the trajectory of the discipline was fundamentally altered by pioneering Indian anthropologists who decolonized its methodology and established its academic autonomy.

Deconstructing the Colonial Construction of Knowledge Colonial anthropology was inherently biased, utilizing evolutionist and racial frameworks to justify imperial rule:

  • Administrator-Ethnographers: Figures like H.H. Risley, E.T. Dalton, E. Thurston, and W. Crooke produced voluminous compendiums (e.g., Tribes and Castes of Bengal). However, their goal was administrative control.
  • Freezing Fluid Identities: Through decennial Census operations (starting 1881), the British converted fluid, dynamic occupational groups into rigid, enumerated "Caste" and "Tribe" categories.
  • Racialization of Caste: Herbert Hope Risley extensively used anthropometry—specifically the "Nasal Index"—to erroneously equate caste hierarchy with racial origins (Aryan vs. Dravidian).
  • Tribes as "Isolates": Colonial ethnography falsely constructed tribes as isolated, "primitive" savages, laying the groundwork for exclusionary policies like the Criminal Tribes Act (1871) and the creation of "Excluded Areas."

The Role of Indian Anthropologists in Sustaining Autonomy The shift from colonial "administrative anthropology" to an autonomous, empathetic, and academic discipline was spearheaded by early Indian scholars:

  • Sarat Chandra Roy (The Father of Indian Ethnography): Roy shifted the discipline from distant census-based classification to intensive, participant-observation fieldwork. By learning local languages and studying the customary laws of the Mundas and Oraons, he brought an emic (insider) perspective. He also founded the journal Man in India (1921), creating an independent intellectual platform free from colonial oversight.
  • L.K. Ananthakrishna Iyer: Pioneered detailed, systematic ethnographic surveys of South Indian communities, combining museum work with deep regional knowledge.
  • Nirmal Kumar Bose: Developed a uniquely Indian "civilizational approach." In his theory of the "Hindu Method of Tribal Absorption," he analyzed tribe-caste continuities based on economic integration rather than colonial racial reductionism.
  • Irawati Karve: Reconstructed the complex regional kinship and family organization of India by brilliantly combining Indological (textual) sources with empirical fieldwork.
  • D.N. Majumdar: Integrated physical and social anthropology, linking anthropological research to contemporary social problems and public policy.
  • Institutionalization: The establishment of the first Anthropology department at Calcutta University (1920) and the Anthropological Survey of India (1945) under B.S. Guha decisively shifted the locus of research from colonial administrators to Indian academics.

Critical Evaluation While Indian anthropologists established institutional autonomy, postcolonial anthropology struggled to entirely escape the colonial hangover. Administrative categories like "tribe" and racial typologies continued to influence state policies. However, Indian scholars successfully widened the discipline's scope to village studies (M.N. Srinivas), national integration, tribal displacement, and cultural change.

Conclusion The autonomy of Indian anthropology was achieved not by discarding all colonial data, but by radically transforming its epistemology. Indian anthropologists shifted the discipline’s objective from classifying subjects for colonial governance to understanding historically situated communities for the purpose of nation-building, social justice, and holistic human development.

2026 Contribution of L. K. Ananthakrishna Iyer in Anthropology. 2026 Assess the contribution of colonial scholars in studying the tribal populations of North-East India. 2025 Anthropology provides a multidimensional understanding of human beings by bridging the gap between science and humanities. Elucidate. 2025 "The agenda of biological anthropology became more scientific from the middle of the twentieth century." Justify.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

Join Workshop Contact VAID ICS

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2024 — Paper II

28 questions

1(d) Artisan tribes of Jharkhand

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > Tribal Situation in India > Socio-economic Characteristics > Artisan tribes; Jharkhand
2024Paper IITribal IndiaModel answer available

5(a) B.K. Roy Burman's concept of 'Buffer Zone'

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > Tribal Administration and Policy > Isolation-Assimilation-Integration > Roy Burman; buffer zone
2024Paper IITribal Development, Policy & SafeguardsModel answer available

1(a) Digitisation of rural economy

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > Indian Village > Economy and Change > Digitisation of the rural economy
2024Paper IIVillage India, Urbanisation & Social ChangeModel answer available

1(b) Origin of State Societies

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > Political Organization > State Formation > Origin of state societies
2024Paper IIEconomic & Political AnthropologyModel answer available

5(d) Status of Sixth Schedule Areas

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > Constitutional Safeguards > Fifth and Sixth Schedules > Sixth Schedule areas
2024Paper IITribal Development, Policy & SafeguardsModel answer available

1(c) Syro-Malabar Christians

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > Impact of Religions on Indian Society > Christianity > Syro-Malabar Christians
2024Paper IIIndian Society, Caste & CivilizationModel answer available