Sacred and Profane in Durkheim’s Theory of Religion — 2015 Paper I
How do you relate the concepts of 'Sacred' and 'Profane' in Durkheim's theory of religion with a focus on the role of totem ?
Model Answer
VAID ICSApproach
- Demand of Question: Explain Durkheim’s sacred–profane distinction and demonstrate how the totem connects religion with clan solidarity and collective consciousness.
- Structuring the Response: Define sacred and profane, explain Australian totemism and collective effervescence, then establish why worship of the totem is ultimately worship of society.
- Key Dimensions to Cover: Durkheim, Elementary Forms, sacred/profane, Arunta, totem, collective representations, collective effervescence and social solidarity.
Model Answer
Introduction: In The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (1912), Émile Durkheim explained religion primarily as a social phenomenon. Its fundamental characteristic is the division of the world into two opposed categories—Sacred and Profane.
Sacred and Profane
Sacred things are:
- set apart;
- protected by prohibitions;
- treated with reverence;
- surrounded by ritual.
Profane refers to the ordinary sphere of everyday life.
Thus:
Sacred ≠ Merely supernatural
Sacred = Socially set apart and collectively revered
Religion consists of beliefs and practices relating to sacred things which unite believers into a moral community or Church.
Totemism as the elementary form
Durkheim based much of his analysis on Australian Aboriginal totemism, particularly ethnographic material relating to the Arunta/Aranda.
A totem may be an:
- animal;
- plant;
- natural object
which serves as the emblem of a clan.
The totem is simultaneously:
- the symbol of a sacred being;
- the emblem of the clan.
Therefore:
Totem = Symbol of divinity + Symbol of society
Why is the totem sacred?
The sacredness of the totem does not arise simply from the physical animal or plant itself.
During collective rituals, members experience intense emotional energy, which Durkheim called collective effervescence.
Thus:
Collective gathering → Emotional excitement → Sacred force → Totemic symbolism
Individuals experience a power greater than themselves and interpret it religiously.
For Durkheim, that power is actually the moral force of society.
Society worshipping itself
The crucial argument is:
Clan → Collective power → Totem → Sacred representation of clan
Hence, when clan members worship the totem, they are symbolically worshipping their own society.
Religion therefore expresses and reinforces the collective consciousness.
Ritual and solidarity
Totemic rituals periodically recreate:
- common beliefs;
- group identity;
- moral obligations;
- social solidarity.
Sacred symbols therefore perform an integrative function.
Relationship between sacred and profane
The two realms remain separate through:
- taboos;
- ritual restrictions;
- prescribed conduct.
Ritual allows controlled movement from ordinary profane existence into sacred collective experience.
Critical assessment
Durkheim’s theory was influential because it demonstrated the social foundation of religion, but it has been criticized for:
- excessive dependence on secondary Australian data;
- treating totemism as an elementary universal form;
- reducing religious experience largely to social solidarity;
- underestimating individual spirituality, conflict and power.
Conclusion
For Durkheim, the sacred–profane distinction constitutes the foundation of religious life, while the totem materializes the collective identity of the clan. Its sacredness derives from society itself; therefore totemic worship is ultimately the symbolic reaffirmation of social solidarity and collective consciousness.
Want feedback on your answer?
Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.