VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2024/Paper I/Prehistoric Archaeology
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper I 2024 10 Marks Model Answer Available

Harappan Maritime Trade — 2024 Paper I

Question · 2024 · Paper I · 10 Marks

Harappan maritime trade

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Introduction

The Mature Harappan Civilisation, dated roughly to 2600–1900 BCE, developed one of the earliest organised maritime trade networks of South Asia. Its coastal settlements connected the Indus plains, Gujarat and Makran coast with Oman, Bahrain and Mesopotamia. Mesopotamian records mention Meluhha, generally identified with the Harappan region, trading through Magan and Dilmun.

Nature of Maritime Trade

Harappan maritime trade was linked with inland agriculture, specialised craft production, riverine transport and overseas exchange. The Indus river system connected inland towns with coastal areas, while Gujarat, Kachchh and Makran provided access to the Arabian Sea. Harappan sailors probably followed coastal navigation, moving along the Makran coast, Oman and Bahrain before reaching Mesopotamia.

Ports and Coastal Centres

Lothal in Gujarat, excavated by S. R. Rao, was the most important maritime centre. It had a brick-lined basin, warehouse, bead-making workshops, seals and weights. The basin is often identified as a dockyard, though its exact function remains debated. Hence, Lothal may be safely described as a major port-like industrial and trading centre.

Sutkagen-dor was a western coastal outpost on the Makran route. Sukta Koh and Balakot acted as coastal stations, with Balakot showing shell-working. Kuntasi had stone anchors, storage areas and landing facilities. Nageshwar and Bagasra were linked with shell, bead, copper and faience industries. Dholavira, though not a conventional seaport, probably used the navigable channels of the Rann of Kachchh as an intermediary centre.

Trade Partners and Routes

Harappan trade operated through three connected routes:

  • Riverine route: Harappa and Mohenjo-daro to lower Indus and coastal regions
  • Coastal route: Gujarat, Kachchh, Saurashtra and Makran coast
  • Overseas route: Makran and Gujarat coast to Magan, Dilmun and then Mesopotamian cities such as Ur, Kish, Lagash and Susa

Commodities Traded

Harappan exports included etched carnelian beads, steatite beads, shell bangles, ivory objects, cotton textiles, timber, pottery, faience and ornaments. Imports probably included copper from Oman, silver, tin, lapis lazuli, bitumen and other luxury raw materials.

Archaeological Evidence

Evidence of maritime trade includes the brick-lined basin and warehouse at Lothal, Harappan seals and weights, terracotta boat models, boat motifs, stone anchors, fish-hooks and marine shells. Harappan seals, beads, pottery and weights found at Ur, Kish, Susa and Bahrain, along with Persian Gulf-type seals at Lothal, confirm overseas contact.

Significance

Harappan maritime trade promoted economic integration by linking inland towns, craft centres and coastal settlements. It supported urbanisation, occupational specialisation and merchant activity. Standardised weights, seals and warehouses indicate regulated exchange and administrative control. It also encouraged cultural interaction with West Asia without destroying Harappan cultural identity. Coastal settlements further show ecological adaptation to creeks, tides, estuaries and marine resources.

Limitations

Harappan maritime trade should not be exaggerated as a modern commercial empire. Much trade was probably indirect through Dilmun and Magan. The Harappan script remains undeciphered, and coastal trade was vulnerable to silting, floods, shifting river channels and climatic changes. After 1900 BCE, weakening urban organisation and declining Mesopotamian demand probably reduced overseas trade.

Conclusion

Harappan maritime trade reveals the technological skill, economic organisation and external contacts of the Indus Civilisation. Through ports, craft workshops, seals, weights and overseas routes, the Harappans became part of the wider Bronze Age exchange network linking South Asia with the Persian Gulf and Mesopotamia. It also reflects India’s ancient maritime tradition and the importance of maritime archaeology today.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2024 — Paper I

28 questions
Syllabus: Paper I > Nature of Culture > Characteristics of Culture > Attributes of culture
2024Paper ICulture & SocietyModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper I > Political Organization and Social Control > Power, Authority and Legitimacy > Band, tribe, chiefdom, state
2024Paper IEconomic & Political AnthropologyModel answer available

5(a) Chronometric dating

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper I > Prehistoric Archaeology > Chronology and Dating > Chronometric (absolute) dating methods
2024Paper IPrehistoric ArchaeologyModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper I > Economic Organization > Reciprocity and Exchange > Kula ring
2024Paper IEconomic & Political AnthropologyModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper I > Prehistoric Archaeology > Chalcolithic and Bronze Age > Harappan civilization; maritime trade
2024Paper IPrehistoric ArchaeologyModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Genetic Polymorphism > Haemoglobinopathies; health and disease
2024Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Quantitative Genetics > Heritability and its estimation
2024Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Mendelian Genetics in Man > Lethal and sublethal genes
2024Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available
Syllabus: Paper I > Human Genetics > Mutation and Genetic Disorders > Single-gene disorders
2024Paper IHuman Genetics & Human BiologyModel answer available