VAID'S ICS – Best UPSC Anthropology Coaching in Delhi Since 1985

Comprehensive Classroom Course · Admissions openRegister now
+91 93113 37737
  • +91-93113 37737, +91-99999 46748
  • 73(FF), Old Rajender Nagar Market, Delhi - 110060
  • MON to SUN 9.00 am - 6.00 pm
Facebook Youtube Instagram
Menu
Enquire Now
Home/Anthropology/Mains PYQ/2018/Paper II/Tribal Problems & Displacement
UPSC MainsAnthropology Optional Paper II 2018 15 Marks Model Answer Available

Land Acquisition Acts of 1894 and 2013 — 2018 Paper II

Question · 2018 · Paper II · 15 Marks

Examine the advancement made in the land acquisition and rehabilitation Act of 2013 over the land acquisition Act of 1894.

Model Answer

VAID ICS

Approach

  • Demand of Question: Compare the 2013 land-acquisition framework with the 1894 Act and identify substantive improvements in rights, compensation, rehabilitation and participation.
  • Structuring the Response: Contrast both Acts on acquisition process, compensation, consent, SIA, rehabilitation and tribal safeguards, followed by a critical assessment.
  • Key Dimensions to Cover: RFCTLARR Act 2013, Social Impact Assessment, consent, compensation, R&R, food security, Gram Sabha, SC/ST safeguards and transparency.

Model Answer

Introduction: The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 primarily empowered the colonial state to acquire private land for “public purpose”, with compensation as its principal safeguard. The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR) replaced this framework with a more participative, transparent and rehabilitation-oriented approach.

Major advancements

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 RFCTLARR Act, 2013
Acquisition-centred Rights and rehabilitation-centred
Broad state discretion Greater procedural scrutiny
No general statutory SIA Social Impact Assessment
Limited participation Public hearing/consultation
Compensation-focused Compensation + statutory R&R
Weak livelihood recognition Wider concept of affected families
No comprehensive tribal safeguards Special safeguards for SC/ST and Scheduled Areas
  1. Social Impact Assessment

One of the most significant changes is the requirement for a Social Impact Assessment (SIA) in applicable acquisitions.

It examines impact on:

  • livelihoods;
  • community resources;
  • infrastructure;
  • social networks;
  • public facilities.

The process also includes public hearings and Expert Group appraisal.

Thus:

Land requirement → SIA → Public scrutiny → Acquisition decision

  1. Consent provisions

For acquisitions covered by the relevant provisions:

  • 80% consent of affected families is required for private-company projects;
  • 70% consent is required for specified PPP projects.

Consent is linked with the SIA process.

This represents a major departure from the largely unilateral character of the 1894 framework.

  1. Fairer compensation

The 2013 Act substantially enhances compensation by using:

  • revised determination of market value;
  • multiplication factors where applicable;
  • 100% solatium;
  • value of attached assets.

The framework can produce compensation broadly up to four times market value in rural areas and twice in urban areas, depending on statutory calculation.

  1. Rehabilitation and Resettlement

Unlike the 1894 Act, the 2013 law gives Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) statutory status.

Entitlements may include:

  • housing;
  • subsistence assistance;
  • transportation support;
  • employment/annuity-related options;
  • resettlement infrastructure.

This recognizes that displacement involves more than loss of titled land.

  1. Recognition of livelihood losers

The concept of affected families is broader than merely formal landowners.

This is anthropologically important because rural and tribal livelihoods may depend upon:

  • tenancy;
  • agricultural labour;
  • common resources;
  • forests;
  • local economic networks.

Hence:

Land loss + Livelihood loss → Both require rehabilitation

  1. Food-security safeguards

The Act introduces special safeguards concerning acquisition of multi-cropped irrigated land, reflecting concern that development should not undermine long-term food security. The Act expressly includes a chapter on safeguarding food security.

  1. Special safeguards for Scheduled Tribes

The 2013 framework is particularly significant for tribal communities.

In Scheduled Areas it places greater emphasis on:

  • consultation with Gram Sabhas;
  • minimizing displacement;
  • protection of community rights;
  • culturally appropriate rehabilitation;
  • resettlement close to traditional habitat where possible.

This recognizes that tribal displacement may involve:

Land loss → Livelihood loss + Cultural loss + Community disintegration

  1. Transparency and institutional mechanisms

The Act provides for:

  • publication of SIA;
  • public hearings;
  • R&R schemes;
  • dedicated R&R authorities and monitoring mechanisms.

Its statutory objective explicitly emphasizes a humane, participative, informed and transparent process.

  1. Return of unutilized land

Section 101 provides that land remaining unutilized for five years from taking possession is to be returned to the original owners/legal heirs or to the government land bank, subject to the statutory framework.

Critical assessment

The 2013 Act represents a major normative advance, but implementation faces problems such as:

  • delays in SIA and R&R;
  • disputes over market valuation;
  • uneven Gram Sabha participation;
  • state-level modifications;
  • administrative pressure to expedite acquisition.

Therefore stronger legislation does not automatically guarantee just rehabilitation.

Conclusion

The 2013 Act marked a fundamental shift:

Eminent-domain approach of 1894 → Rights-based and participatory acquisition framework

Its major advances lie in Social Impact Assessment, consent, enhanced compensation, statutory rehabilitation, livelihood recognition and special protection for vulnerable communities, especially Scheduled Tribes. Its success, however, ultimately depends on effective implementation and genuine participation of affected people.

2026 Make a critical appraisal of Niyamgiri movement against mining-induced displacement. 2026 Write an account on the prevalence of sickle cell disease among the tribal populations of India. What are the initiatives undertaken by the affected states to tackle with this disease? 2026 What are the major challenges tribal communities are facing in contemporary India? 2025 Examine the environmental and biocultural factors influencing the health of tribals of India.

Want feedback on your answer?

Join the Anthropology workshop or get structured answer-writing guidance from VAID ICS.

Join Workshop Contact VAID ICS

UPSC Anthropology Optional 2018 — Paper II

28 questions

5(c) Agrarian social structure

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 5.1 Indian Village > Agrarian relations in Indian villages
2018Paper IIVillage India, Urbanisation & Social ChangeModel answer available

1(c) Endangered Languages

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 2. Demographic profile of India > Linguistic elements and their distribution
2018Paper IIIndian Society, Caste & CivilizationModel answer available

5(e) Modernization

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 5.3 Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change > Modernization
2018Paper IIVillage India, Urbanisation & Social ChangeModel answer available

1(d) OBCs among non-Hindu communities

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 7.1 Problems of exploitation and deprivation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes
2018Paper IIIndian Society, Caste & CivilizationModel answer available

1(b) Philosophy behind Purusharthas

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 3.1 Structure and nature of traditional Indian social system > Purushartha
2018Paper IIIndian Society, Caste & CivilizationModel answer available

5(b) Tribe and scheduled tribe

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 6.1 Tribal situation in India > Definition and scheduling of tribes
2018Paper IITribal IndiaModel answer available

5(a) Youth dormitory as an institution

10 Marks150 words
Syllabus: Paper II > 6.1 Tribal situation in India > Social institutions of tribal societies
2018Paper IITribal IndiaModel answer available